gimmesix
Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life
- Messages
- 41,242
- Reaction score
- 38,575
Actually, the scheme better fits these players and perhaps these linemen. Last year when we switched to McCarthy's scheme, for some reason we wanted to use primarily an inside zone running game. We didn't have the lead back for that since Pollard is more of an outside guy and frankly, our blocking was not good enough. Elliott and Freeman are both between-the-tackles runners and if we don't have to kick Tyler out to LT, the interior line should be a strength if Beebe can make a successful transition to center. That would put a lot of power in the middle for the backs to run behind. I still don't know why we didn't primarily run an outside zone blocking scheme last year considering Pollard's strength was operating in space. We did use outside zone and duo, but not as much as the previous year and certainly not as much as we needed to with a back who thrives on the edge.I don't have a lot of confidence in our run game for 2 reasons - Players and scheme. Didn't upgrade our running back room and are relying on an older Zeke and some unproven youngsters. MAYBE we get some improvement out of our run game because of the change up on the OL (I liked trying to upgrade the center spot as I felt like that was our weak area). Same coordinator so I doubt the blocking scheme will change much. Same scheme with equal to less RB with equal to more OL = roughly same results. Now if we can change up/improve our blocking scheme and improve/strengthen the interior blocking (center), then maybe, just maybe we can get by with our RBBC approach. Between this and not adding more beef to DT, we will underperform in the 2 most vital areas when it counts the most.