TheMarathonContinues
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 83,522
- Reaction score
- 76,367
Third? Daniel Jones? Really?He might even be third in the division after last year.
Third? Daniel Jones? Really?He might even be third in the division after last year.
you know I think Dak gets a bad rap in here some of its deserved some of it is by football know nothings. But ill say this if we were basing it soley on last year I wouldnt rule out him being the 3rd best QB in the division heck there were times he looked like the 4th best. I think its anomally though and dak alone was not the reason he looked like he did there were factors involved.Third? Daniel Jones? Really?
The negative threads about the HC have practically gone away during this offseason ( a few "fat\ big eater" comments still pop up and there).I was beginning to think that we would go one day without a Dak or MM bashing thread, but here we go!
He better be the 2nd best…..or the song remains the sameHe might even be third in the division after last year.
Agreed, of course I have used the term "Bi-polar" but in essence it's the same thing."At his best". Seriously, though. The article makes some valid points. Other QBs have miscues and don't get nearly as much criticism as Dak.
But as much as I have criticized Dak by saying he is really two Daks, Good Dak and Bad Dak, Good Dak is really, really good. When he is making quick smart decisions, seeing the field and spreading the ball around to the open receivers he is as good as anyone in the league not named Mahomes. The problem is, we do not see Good Dak all the time. In fact, we saw him far too infrequently last year. If Dak puts it together and has a year of Good Dak games strung together for the entire season, he will be the MVP of the league.
The opposite side of the coin is that Bad Dak is really bad. If McCarthy can find a way to minimize appearances by Bad Dak the Cowboys will finally make it to the Super Bowl.
I get Hurts. It's only a one year sample size but it was a great one year so I get it. But Daniel Jones? That one I don't get. I'd take Dak at his worst over Daniel Jones at this best.you know I think Dak gets a bad rap in here some of its deserved some of it is by football know nothings. But ill say this if we were basing it soley on last year I wouldnt rule out him being the 3rd best QB in the division heck there were times he looked like the 4th best. I think its anomally though and dak alone was not the reason he looked like he did there were factors involved.
I think this year hell go back to being top 7 but that still may not be enough to get the team over the san fran hump. If it isnt than Jerry should bite the bullett and move on. the problem is that dang contract is pretty restrictive.
Yeah because that's ll you need to win is a good QB and defense....that explains why Josh Allen has so many rings lol.great
no excuse to not make it to the super bowl with this defense then
Some think he's not even the best on the team...but that's just an idiotic point of view.……..not even the best quarterback in his division.
Whether you agree with the statement or not, the article is filled with substantive research and data. To refute them is fine, but to do so with just an ‘eye test’ especially as a fan, is nonsensical.
A stupid viewpoint.Nothing embarrassing about it. Just a different viewpoint.
I mean if you want to be a child about it sure. Anyone who doesn't agree with you is "stupid". Very childish take but at least it's consistent.A stupid viewpoint.
i said make it to super bowlYeah because that's ll you need to win is a good QB and defense....that explains why Josh Allen has so many rings lol.
Their idea of refuting is putting their hands over their ears and closing their eyes lol.Whether you agree with the statement or not, the article is filled with substantive research and data. To refute them is fine, but to do so with just an ‘eye test’ especially as a fan, is nonsensical.
Then why hasn't Josh Allen gone to a SB? His defense is stacked...much better than what Burrow and Mahomes have on defense.i said make it to super bowl
josh allen loss to mahomes and burrows in the playoff
Lol I saw people bringing up points that were directly addressed in the article with data and analytics.Their idea of refuting is putting their hand over their ears and closing their eyes lol.
Not at all lol. They read the title of the thread and go ham lol.Lol I saw people bringing up points that were directly addressed in the article with data and analytics.
Like does anyone care to read and learn anymore?