Super_Kazuya
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 7,074
- Reaction score
- 9,113
Doomsday101;5048676 said:Hard to say, Troy situation in Dallas was different than that of Favre or Steve Young. Heck Dallas had Emmitt a 3 time rushing leader and eventual all time leading rusher. A HOF WR in Irvin, a great TE in Novacheck, FB Johnston and a heck of an OL. Not to mention a play making defense.
When Troy was forced into passing wars with the likes of Favre, he did it but over all as you mention Troy gave up personal stats for overall team success, he did not have to put the ball up near as often as Brett did.
I know it's speculation but even if you compare things that aren't based on totals, Favre comes out on top pretty easily. Heck, Aikman's hallmark was supposed to be his accuracy, but Favre actually has a higher career completion percentage (it's close though and both have fine marks). But throw all that out, just going by what you know... do you REALLY think Aikman was better than Favre? In the mid-nineties Favre was like the Jordan of the NFL, he was running around doing all of this magic that Romo does except he had a bazooka for an arm that could make throws Romo could only dream about. And he took care of the ball very well, too. From 95-97, Aikman had a 47 TD to 32 INT ratio, while Favre had a whopping 112 TD to 42 INT ratio, which is really phenomenal considering the risks he took and the amount he threw. Would you trade 75 TDs for 10 INTs? The correct answer is yes.
I just don't think Troy has the talent to match Favre, even if you turned him loose in a passing offense. But I admit, it's just an idea that can't ever be proven.