I would have admitted I don't know enough and would have hired people who do. That's what a great owner does.
What is interesting about your comment is that most of the guys employed who supposedly "know" what to do...
Do things that this board constantly complains is stupid.
So...it gets narrowed down to how many people do you think are able to run a team in this World...and how many of the currently employed do you think pass your test and how many dont?
I just dont think its as easy as people think...and just "hiring" someone you think makes good football decisions isnt always qualified. I think its like the Stock Market. Supposedly over the course of 4 or 5 decades only a few fund managers have beat the S&P 500 consistently. And...when they do...its short lived. There is a hot hand at the trading desk and then he reverts back to average or below. Very few consistently cut the mustard. Yet...these sports boards just put unnecessary pressure on Orgs to do things...and usually its short term related.
If someone wants to trailblaze...they will go against the QB market and use rookie QBs constantly. That requires beating the "S&P 500" consistently by evaluating QB's coming out of college correctly enough. And the spill over to that is...what QB's want to sign with a team that only wants them for their rook contract? You could argue that your team construction and system is so dialed in for rookie QBs to succeed. But no one has done it consistently yet.