ActualCowboysFan
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 6,416
- Reaction score
- 9,498
He didn't actuallyRoger just signed a new and very lucrative contract with the NFL. I hope that he chokes on every cent of it...
He didn't actuallyRoger just signed a new and very lucrative contract with the NFL. I hope that he chokes on every cent of it...
Was it finalized?
bothThe league office is either incompetent or corrupt. Take your pick
The league office is either incompetent or corrupt. Take your pick
He didn't actually
I think I'll go with option C. and choose ArrogantThe league office is either incompetent or corrupt. Take your pick
The league office is either incompetent or corrupt. Take your pick
The funny thing about this "new information" is that it in no way excuses the NFL's behavior. All this means is Goodell was part of the conspiracy. To be honest, I'm a little insulted that the NFL thinks fans are that stupid to not put that together. The other aspect of this case I find to be both hilarious and unsettling is the recent admittance that in light of this new information a reduction might be in play now. A reduction? Seriously? They honestly think a reduction would make this go away in light of all the new information that has come to light?NFL: Goodell was aware of Kia Roberts’ opinions
The allegation that league executives conspired to keep the opinions of director of investigations Kia Roberts from Commissioner Roger Goodell is not accurate.
“I can tell you without any hesitation that this is false,” NFL spokesman Joe Lockhart told PFT by phone on Friday morning.
Lockhart explained that Goodell was aware of the views of everyone on the team. Roberts, according to Elliott’s lawsuit, believed Tiffany Thompson was not credible, and that Elliott should not be suspended.
“It’s categorically false that the information was kept from the Commission,” Lockhart said.
Lockhart did not dispute the notion that Roberts believed Thompson to not be credible. He noted that the Commissioner was aware of Roberts’ concerns regarding the credibility of Thompson and other witnesses.
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2017/09/01/nfl-goodell-was-aware-of-kia-roberts-opinions/
Isn't Stephen Jones on the competition committee?...The Patriots and Goodell tension seemed to remain until the team won the Super Bowl in February. While Jones has remained mum on Elliot issue with no statement coming since the suspension was delivered in Aug. 11
With his contract ending and two of the league’s top owners at odd with Goodell there was some speculation that his tenure was coming to an end. However, he does not need the approval of all 32 owners to remain at the helm, as the competition committee was given the power to make this decision.
The most important part of this would be that this extension would keep Goodell in power for the next collective bargaining agreement. The CBA is set to expire in 2020 with both side already preparing for the worst...
http://defpen.com/commissioner-goodell-closing-in-on-5-year-extension/
Whether or not it got to Goodell is only part of the story. The lead investigator's position was entirely absent from their conclusions.
I realize it probably matters from the standpoint of challenging the league's protocol for administering suspensions, but the PR implications are damning
The funny thing about this "new information" is that it in no way excuses the NFL's behavior. All this means is Goodell was part of the conspiracy. To be honest, I'm a little insulted that the NFL thinks fans are that stupid to not put that together. The other aspect of this case I find to be both hilarious and unsettling is the recent admittance that in light of this new information a reduction might be in play now. A reduction? Seriously? They honestly think a reduction would make this go away in light of all the new information that has come to light?
Truly laughable.
Yes, because the NFL league office would never lie about a fact of the case.
I am generally curious why you are fighting tooth and nail here against Elliott. I get wanting to see more facts before reaching a conclusion but with every turn of this case, and mostly not good for the NFL, you've attempted multiple ways to concoct a defense for the NFL.
So I have to ask, why? Do you have familiarity with DV that makes you prone to believe the girl and therefore, by extension, have to defend everything the NFL says and does here?
Hmmm sounds like the Ray Rice video
It's funny how the most important aspects of the investigations are always missing from their initial findings.
But when Friel is telling everyone that only 1 of the 5 incidents was not credible. And Kia Roberts concerns about the creditability on all the incidents is not mentioned or included in the file. It seems to conflict with him (or the advisors) being aware unless he was the one who did the conspiring which is even more damning.The funny thing about this "new information" is that it in no way excuses the NFL's behavior. All this means is Goodell was part of the conspiracy. To be honest, I'm a little insulted that the NFL thinks fans are that stupid to not put that together. The other aspect of this case I find to be both hilarious and unsettling is the recent admittance that in light of this new information a reduction might be in play now. A reduction? Seriously? They honestly think a reduction would make this go away in light of all the new information that has come to light?
Truly laughable.