PFT: Reeves: “Coaches Never Punch A Clock”

[5Stars]

You can't brush this under the table Mr. "He wouldn't come because of TO".


The above is you replying to me in another post where I said replying to yourself was gay.

I'll give you 24 hours to find a post of mine that said that.

If you find it, I'll send you 50 bones, if not you send me 50 bones! We can PM each others address.

Don't make accusations that you cannot prove. You should know better then that...what you say, sucker?





Deal, or weasle?

Go away...I'm not talking to you....fool!

iPity fools like you and me...

 

[TwoDeep3]

A question was posed earlier in this thread -- how does one quantify this clause with your head coach? Jerry says to Jimmy, et al., you have to work as many hours as ....who? It's the head coach. So how plausible is it that clause is in the contract?

As to why no previous coaches have come out in the press verifying or denying this...why would they? What's to be gained by them? Media time? A chance to either vilify or toot Jerry's horn?

And finally, maybe you would have fired those guys. But I doubt highly you would have brought them on board, had discussions to iron out their role and salary, gave them an office, and then days later when time to sign the contract, you've inserted a clause specifying whatever it is Jerry is specifying. My sense would be, if you're fair, you would discuss this clause when you had all your other pertinent discussions. That's the issue. Not whether you believe Jerry or not.

And for purposes of this issue, what better way to run off someone with the skins on wall Reeves has than to indirectly question his work ethic? Jerry changed his mind. Simple. He didn't want him here. Jerry's history is filled with examples of when he wants a player, coach, whatever, he will get that person here. Not lose out on them on a technicality.

Grassy knoll rebuttal.

It was not the second gunman theory.

And the press surely could verify this regardless of what the impetus of the ex-coach.

 

[Bleu Star]

You can't brush this under the table Mr. "He wouldn't come because of TO".


The above is you replying to me in another post where I said replying to yourself was gay.

I'll give you 24 hours to find a post of mine that said that.

If you find it, I'll send you 50 bones, if not you send me 50 bones! We can PM each others address.

Don't make accusations that you cannot prove. You should know better then that...





Deal, or weasle?

You crack me up. :

 

[Bleu Star]

Go away...I'm not talking to you....fool!

iPity fools like you and me...

Repeat after me: The iReeves deal didn't fall through because of TO.

 

[odog422]

Grassy knoll rebuttal.

It was not the second gunman theory.

And the press surely could verify this regardless of what the impetus of the ex-coach.

Selective belief system....grassy knoll rebuttal...

I've got an idea on those responses but hey, whatever.

The point is, you asked whats all the hubbub? I told you the reason for debate, yet you seem to remain mystified...? Or you don't think people are entitled to their opinion...? Honestly, I just don't get where you're coming from.

No biggie. I thought I was being helpful by making factual statements and illustrating why people were debating.

 

[CATCH17]

If I was Jerry I would've walked in and said danny punch that clock!

And then just left the room doing a c walk.

 

[GimmeTheBall!]

Repeat after me: The iReeves deal didn't fall through because of TO.

But T.O. caused the mortgage bonds collapse.

 

[khiladi]

I don't give a dime if Dan Reeves isn't here, as long as the offense totally re-vamps it's running game according to the personnel it has. Wade has to be given the authority to actually assert this, otherwise, with our group of receivers, this offense is going to be average.

 

[jobberone]

I think Jason Garrett got his panties in a wad and Jerry backed out. Why else would Dan be here. Or Reeves got too non-yes with Jerry.