I understand there are multiple sides to this and I can be sympathetic to many of them, but I am against a group of owners forcing out another owner unless there is a serious infraction of some rules or laws. If Snyder did, in fact, hide revenue from the other owners basically stealing their chares of profits, then that is something I where I can see the owners forcing him to sell the team. But all these other allegations regarding the way he managed his team, or others managed his team, that is not enough for force him to sell his team. Somewhere along the line there has to be respect for the legal ownership of property. Not liking the guy should not be adequate grounds for forcing him out. These things tend to be a slippery slope.
At this point I do not believe the Washington team stiffed the rest of the owners on revenue sharing. I have no idea if Snyder would do such a thing, but I am skeptical that he could do such a thing and no one would notice. I imagine the league pays at least some attention to revenue payments coming in from all the teams. No one noticed Washington's "envelope" was a little light lately? I am going to reserve judgement until I see more evidence that some anonymous tipster.
I also think congress has better things to do than get involved in football or how NFL owners behave. Just because congress has authorized the anti-trust exemption for the NFL should not mean they can investigate anything, even things outside anti-trust issues. If an owner is stealing from other owners, let the league deal with it. Congress has a country to worry about, football is the least of it.