FCBarca
New Member
- Messages
- 2,475
- Reaction score
- 0
theogt;1764540 said:This post is a joke, right?
This post is apparently an example of sarcasm too right?
OLB is not much of a weakness for this defense...ILB is.
theogt;1764540 said:This post is a joke, right?
Yeagermeister;1764116 said:Spears is a DE not DT but no thanks after what he did to Gurode
FCBarca;1764555 said:This post is apparently an example of sarcasm too right?
OLB is not much of a weakness for this defense...ILB is.
CaptainAmerica;1764557 said:Randy Moss is the most dominant, game-changing offensive player ever. He is the only player who opposing coaches and players genuinely fear.
Wow. Someone's credibility went through the floor.FCBarca;1764555 said:This post is apparently an example of sarcasm too right?
OLB is not much of a weakness for this defense...ILB is.
theogt;1764567 said:Wow. Someone's credibility went through the floor.
Have a nice day.
Dunno. I just assumed he had some to begin with. I haven't really noticed his posts in the past.Rack;1764568 said:What credibility?
theogt;1764572 said:Dunno. I just assumed he had some to begin with. I haven't really noticed his posts in the past.
Seven;1764566 said:Kinda layin' it on a little thick....................There's alot of players who are feared. #81 being one of them. Barbarian, Witten, ROMOetc.
CaptainAmerica;1764557 said:Randy Moss is the most dominant, game-changing offensive player ever. He is the only player who opposing coaches and players genuinely fear. I would sign him in a heartbeat. It was predictable that he would resume his dominant play once he got out of purgatory in Oakland.
I would let Glenn and Crayton walk, (although I really love Crayton and would welcome him as the 3rd receiver),and I would sign Moss. For those that say he and T.O. couldn't get along, I disagree. They are perfect compliments to each other with T.O. running the crossing routes and Moss running the deep routes.
I can't even imagine how good our offense would be if we added Moss. Just say hello to #6 and #7. :lombardi:
Rack;1764563 said:ILB may not be a "Strength" for the defense but it sure as hell isn't a "Weakness".
Want to bet?FCBarca;1764612 said:We'll see come the offseason and the areas of need that will surely be addressed...ILB will be on that list along with WR, RB and DB.
CaptainAmerica;1764589 said:No, I really believe Moss is the only one actually feared.
The others you mentioned have to be game-planned for and they all have the respect of the other teams, but with Moss it's like you hold your breath waiting for the moment in the game he is going to kill you with an incredible, 50 yard TD catch between two defenders. Moss demoralizes the opposing team.
Chocolate Lab;1764610 said:Yeah, but think about how T.O. would react... Just a few weeks ago he was talking about "The other 81".
Moss might actually be able to handle it -- he's not looking for the spotlight this year -- but I doubt T.O. could.
Besides, I bet you Moss stays there. Unfortunately, he seems to really like Belichick and Brady. And as much as he's helped their team, they might just pony up and pay him.
sjordan6;1764442 said:Well I think that most of the players you have listed as FA Dallas will allow to walk.
Patrick Crayton....is an exceptional third receiver and has proven this season that he can be a good second receiver. I know that the Cowboys would love to sign him but for how much? I just dont believe the Cowboys will be able to sign him when you have teams like the Titans, 49ers, or others who have cap space in need of a proven receiver. Crayton has great hands and runs good routes, assets that more than make up for his lack of speed. I think Crayton will be worth more than the Cowboys will be willing to spend.
sjordan6 said:Look for the Cowboys to get a big-time receiver in the off-season to offset the retirement of Terry Glenn and departure of Crayton.
sjordan6 said:I think Adams walk and they allow McQuistan to take his place or use one of their late first rounders on a offensive tackle.
sjordan6 said:Reeves is not going anyware.

Rack;1764486 said:Maybe (doubt it seriously) but Suggs is still > Ellis.
