Aven8
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 29,133
- Reaction score
- 45,990
Vinnie2u;5067583 said:We had the special teams draft... Now the Romo Friendly draft..
If only they would change the rule from 11 players to 14!!
Vinnie2u;5067583 said:We had the special teams draft... Now the Romo Friendly draft..
NickZepp;5067522 said:If he stayed in college a year he probably goes 2nd-3rd round. He's talented.
NextGenBoys;5067610 said:Because we took a TE in round two, implying we will use 2 TE sets more, which devalues the WR position a small amount.
Then when you combine what we have in Dwayne Harris, and the underneath/wiggle role that Coale Beasley could fill, I just dont think we needed to go WR there. Would have preferred to wait a year and get a WR then.
If we had not taken a TE in rd two, I would have loved the pick. But when we already have pro bowlers at both positions, why draft pure depth in the 2nd and 3rd rounds, when there are much more pressing needs?
I understand BPA, but only to a certain extent.
NickZepp;5067591 said:I don't love the pick. Probably a player we needed. I wanted James Franklin out of UCLA the most of any back left going into today.
Aikmaniac;5067623 said:So the question coming to my mind is...how does a complete back like this slip to the 5th round?
RB's aren't nearly as valuable as they once were. Even the really good ones.Aikmaniac;5067623 said:So the question coming to my mind is...how does a complete back like this slip to the 5th round?
Aikmaniac;5067623 said:So the question coming to my mind is...how does a complete back like this slip to the 5th round?
MakeNoise4TheBoys;5067593 said:is Cornellius Washington still available?
Aikmaniac;5067623 said:So the question coming to my mind is...how does a complete back like this slip to the 5th round?
Aikmaniac;5067623 said:So the question coming to my mind is...how does a complete back like this slip to the 5th round?
NextGenBoys;5067610 said:Because we took a TE in round two, implying we will use 2 TE sets more, which devalues the WR position a small amount.
Then when you combine what we have in Dwayne Harris, and the underneath/wiggle role that Coale Beasley could fill, I just dont think we needed to go WR there. Would have preferred to wait a year and get a WR then.
If we had not taken a TE in rd two, I would have loved the pick. But when we already have pro bowlers at both positions, why draft pure depth in the 2nd and 3rd rounds, when there are much more pressing needs?
I understand BPA, but only to a certain extent.
scottsp;5067523 said:No problems with this one. Good job.
IAmLegend;5067514 said:Good value in the 5th.
[youtube]nQSoR71NQck[/youtube]
[youtube]3wkezITd1u8[/youtube]
NextGenBoys;5067610 said:Because we took a TE in round two, implying we will use 2 TE sets more, which devalues the WR position a small amount.
Then when you combine what we have in Dwayne Harris, and the underneath/wiggle role that Coale Beasley could fill, I just dont think we needed to go WR there. Would have preferred to wait a year and get a WR then.
If we had not taken a TE in rd two, I would have loved the pick. But when we already have pro bowlers at both positions, why draft pure depth in the 2nd and 3rd rounds, when there are much more pressing needs?
I understand BPA, but only to a certain extent.
He probably won't need holes that big. He looks like a decent goal line guy. We can use that.DallasInDC;5067655 said:Not saying that he wasn't a good pick, but I guarantee you he won't be running through holes as big as the ones in the first highlight video in the NFL.