Verdict
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 26,045
- Reaction score
- 20,236
We are not going anywhere without Dak and no offensive line. After getting throttled by the Commanders, I expected us to play the young guys and regroup next season.
Then we traded Griffen for a pick, and I’m thinking “great, Jerry sees the value in playing the young guys, having a bad record and getting good draft picks.”
Next I hear Poe and Worley will be traded or cut, and I’m thinking “Jerry has seen that these guys suck, is cutting his losses, moving on, and playing the young guys”. I’m thinking good deal, we won’t get anything for them, but if so, good for Jerry”.
Next I hear we may be looking to trade for Fitzpatrick? Why in the hell would we do that? Surely it’s just “click bait”.
Play DiNucci, see what you have in him and take your lumps. If he starts a Dak streak, so be it. But where are we going in the playoffs without an OL or DL?
It only makes sense to trade for a player you plan on keeping longer term, and preferably a position of need. DL. Corner. Safety. OT.
Then we traded Griffen for a pick, and I’m thinking “great, Jerry sees the value in playing the young guys, having a bad record and getting good draft picks.”
Next I hear Poe and Worley will be traded or cut, and I’m thinking “Jerry has seen that these guys suck, is cutting his losses, moving on, and playing the young guys”. I’m thinking good deal, we won’t get anything for them, but if so, good for Jerry”.
Next I hear we may be looking to trade for Fitzpatrick? Why in the hell would we do that? Surely it’s just “click bait”.
Play DiNucci, see what you have in him and take your lumps. If he starts a Dak streak, so be it. But where are we going in the playoffs without an OL or DL?
It only makes sense to trade for a player you plan on keeping longer term, and preferably a position of need. DL. Corner. Safety. OT.