Tripod;1275608 said:
[
Bledsoe on the other hand had plenty of help, but couldn't get the job done. Romo isn't perfect, but I don't know of many QB's that would exceed with how the rest of the team is playing right now.
YAKUZA
Bledsoe had plenty of help? Huh? It's the same team this year for both of them. Bledsoe 3 wins 2.5 losses, Romo 6 wins 4.5 losses.
Drops? Bledsoe had 9 passes dropped by halftime vs Tennesee verified by Parcells and the announcers.
I doubt you're talking about last year. Bledsoe had no Flozell or JuJones for half a year and no guy named Terrell Owens for the whole year. But for 3 field goals (2 chip shots) Bledsoe was a 12-4 quarterback. His Cowboys of '05
also had a 9-7 record and the strength of schedule was at least 10 notches tougher.
Bledsoe's legacy here gets worse as the Romo hype rolls on. The spin is way out of whack and the blurred vision exists even after today. Amazing.[/quote]
Thank you for confirming what I've been telling these kids since halftime of the Giants game.
We end up with the same record as last year with alot more talent on the field. Our schedule this year was alot weaker also.
Romo is the only spot where got worse this year.
Bledsoe wasn't blowing out the winning teams like he was the bad teams, but Romo isn't even winning against the bad teams.
Guess what else, now we have to go on the road in the playoffs without our veteran QB. All the Romo fans keep saying, "Well this is just his first year."
My point exactly, why limp into the playoffs with an inexperienced guy who may or may not belong in the NFL with a superbowl veteran on the sideline.
This, my friends, is why parcells will be fired next monday.
