Saints...and how did that work out for Da Bears?
my bad.. you are right. And then Ricky Williams thought he was from Jamaica Mon... and wanted to spend more time with those funky cigarettes instead of playing... and Ill ask again, how did that work out for them Saints?Saints...
Not saying it easy a good trade (BTW that was when Ditka coached NO)... Just saying it was a huge trade....no one had ever traded their entire draft for one player.and how did that work out for Da Bears?
Ware > HaleyI look at that 2007 team and go player for player vs the 1993 team.
This is not an exaggeration--almost not a single player is better. Witten > Novacek, maybe. An older (and inured late season) TO is not better than Michael Irvin.
Barber vs Emmitt Smith? Seriously.
It's just not close if you look at the whole roster on both sides of the ball.
I'm I'm not even going to start with those 70s teams full of HOFers.
Romo is easily 3rd
Bingo. It is always a question of the talent level of ALL players, working cohesively and executing offensively and defensive--along with special teams' play--BETTER than the other team, who are doing their best to win by negating what your team does best. This thread was created to entice an in-depth discussion of this particular conversation topic that has recently been made a point of emphasis.Counting pro bowlers in no way is a good measure of surrounding talent.
That is possible. Typically, people develop their allegiances for sports and certain sports teams at an early age, usually well before they have exited their teenage years.I think more people voting for Troy Aikman first, is because there are more people that remember that era
Have to disagree, Whirly. The Aikman team was simply frickin' stacked. That team had starter quality players for backups.I think more people voting for Troy Aikman first, is because there are more people that remember that era
One of Romo's pro bowlers was Mike Jenkins, who was the 3rd alternate.Bingo. It is always a question of the talent level of ALL players, working cohesively and executing offensively and defensive--along with special teams' play--BETTER than the other team, who are doing their best to win by negating what your team does best. This thread was created to entice an in-depth discussion of this particular conversation topic that has recently been made a point of emphasis.
The number of bodies, even bodies with special accolades, does not always equal the level of talent supposed represented BY the collective number of bodies ON the field. Subjective? Yes, but any difference in opinion is tied completely with each individual's comprehension and evaluation of said talent from an experiencing all-variables perspective.
Excellent question. I was wavering on making Staubach's crew as #1.Here is a thoughtful question that I hope player only fans of Aikman and Romo will not take offense.
"What if the Board of Selectors finally voted in those Staubach's pro bowl teammates whom they have barred from entering the Hall after all these years?"
While I do think it's very close, I do give the 90's guys an edge.Excellent question. I was wavering on making Staubach's crew as #1.
Without question. Ken Hamlin, Nick Folk, Marion Barber?
List of Pro Bowlers
1978 Roger Staubach: Randy White, Cliff Harris, Charlie Waters, Billy Joe DuPree, Tony Dorsett, Tony Hill, Thomas Henderson & Harvey Martin
1993 Troy Aikman: Emmitt Smith, Erik Williams, Mark Stepnoski, Nate Newton, Michael Irvin, Ken Norton, Thomas Everett, Daryl Johnston, Russell Maryland & Jay Novacek
2007 Tony Romo: DeMarcus Ware, Jason Witten, Terrell Owens, Andre Gurode, Flozell Adams, Leonard Davis, Marion Barber, Greg Ellis, Nick Folk, Ken Hamlin, Terence Newman & Roy Williams
Note: Poll option allows for changing of your vote at a later time.
Roughly, 4th in terms of prodiction/results.Romo is easily 3rd