Nobody is trying to omit anything. What I am saying (and I'm sure you will ignore again THIS TIME) is that being the lead dog will take those big plays out of Pollard's game over time. I said two weeks ago that I thought he'd be fine against the Bears.. One game isn't where it shows up.. It's over the course of a season.. week in and week out having to do the dirty work.. Blocking, short yardage, inside runs, outside runs, all of it. Every defense won't be Chicago. Some will be like Washington, or the Bucs, or the Eagles.. Some will defeat our line and force the back to make something on his own. Some will have great inside backers who don't let you get to the edge.
It's fascinating that folks claim in one breath that the toll of being the lead dog has taken away Zeke's burst.. then advocate doing the same thing to Pollard and expecting different results. If you hand over the lead dog role to Pollard you MIGHT get a 2-3 game bump from him. Maybe 5-6 games. Maybe you get a full season.. But eventually his slighter build, especially up top will cause him to lose juice. And when he loses that juice you guys will be clamoring for HIS backup and again act as if you have never seen this movie before..