I don't really care what he is paid.. either he is the answer at QB or he's not.
I'm not really into this "team friendly deal" stuff.
Can you elaborate at least?
I know youre a shock bot and this is all about shock value...
Are all the bots on this site with this hard core approach...do they think they would be employed long as GM's in the NFL? If so...what happens when players start to not want to play for you because of your hard core approach? Do you think you would still be employed?
I dont get it. Nothing about telling players "You arent Michael Jordan, I dont want you and I am not paying you" screams players would join your team in Free Agency. Nothing about taking advantage of rookie contracts screams players would want to flock to your team.
I am not saying your idea is wrong...Im saying it doesnt work like that...assuming all this is real.
There has been like 4 real deal QB's in the past 25 years. Youre going to waste the rest of your teams stars' career searching for Michael Jordan at QB? You'll lose the locker room and word will get out around the league that your Org is mismanaging.
Its the same thing every day around here. Shock comments and then side-stepping real issues that real GM's have to deal with.
Youre purposely not stating your stance. Youre not stating whether current QB market price is an issue at all....just that you arent into team friendly deals. You arent stating what your requirements are for "the answer" regarding QB's. Are they unrealistic requirements? How many "answers" are there in any particular year in the NFL to you?
Most comments around here leave the door open for "He aint Brady, Mahomes or hasnt won a SB...so I want a rookie contract"