I hear you but either they increase the cap significantly or create some type of soft cap hit for QBs. The market might just adjust itself when owners and GMs; realize they can not afford paying these guys this type of money and fielding a competitive team at the same time.
Bold> If you are suggesting some sort of NBA/Larry Bird rule exclusively for quarterbacks, it is a possibility. I have advocated for the NFL doing something similar since the late 90s since it was easy to see where contracts, especially quarterback contracts, would eventually head.
That said, I will believe it will happen when I see it happen. Both the owners and players' union have made minor tweaks to their hard capped collective bargaining agreement structure over the years. Contracts for rookies is one example. However, big adjustments have not happened.
This three-decade long CBA framework has been supported by owners and union alike from day one. It maintains overall competitive balance leaguewide, ensuring relative parity. It does not prevent teams from sabotaging their rosters.
The system makes certain one team's loss is another team's gain over the short-term, which means one team's fans will dislike what happens for a while and another team will enjoy what happens for a while. Over and over again. It keeps ticket sales going. It keeps networks happy with a steady market audience. And owners and players (primarily star players) keep making money hand over fist. Kumbaya, I guess.