America's Cowboy
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 33,315
- Reaction score
- 46,740
You do realize why they get beat in pass blocking, right?You understand this thread is about pass blocking, right?
You do realize why they get beat in pass blocking, right?You understand this thread is about pass blocking, right?
It was as bad as it looked.
Sign Warford and move Connor to RT until La’el comes back.So, what can we do about it? We are waiting for La'el to come back, however, will he really solve all the issues? We may need to begin rebuilding this O-line faster than we think. Piece by piece.
Exactly. They have certainly redefined what QBs get blamed for. Every sack is now the QBs fault. If a receiver has to make any adjustment to catch a ball they shouldn’t be expected to catch it. If the RB gets hit in the backfield it is because the defense isn’t scared of the QB. Playing in bad weather conditions is still no excuse for an offense to struggle, etc, etc.Dak haters will say the oline not blocking is Dak fault.
It was as bad as it looked.
Yes.You do realize why they get beat in pass blocking, right?
Lol. It's clear you don't know what you are talking about, played on the Oline and much less excelled playing it.Yes.
You do realize "firing off" would be a run blocking issue, right?
Sure you did.Lol. It's clear you don't know what you are talking about, played on the Oline and much less excelled playing it.
Larry Allen is a member of this forum?!?!Lol. It's clear you don't know what you are talking about, played on the Oline and much less excelled playing it.
If Romo was still our QB the offensive line would be under attack today.
If Romo was still our QB the offensive line would be under attack today.
I've got the awards. What do you have?Sure you did.
If Romo was still our QB the offensive line would be under attack today.
And then he would break the pocket and make a play for the defense.Romo would break the pocket and make a play.
Yep, except for all the times he couldn’t do that and we lost and it was never his fault because he was “running for his life”. Poor one man show vs 53 on the other side.if Romo was our QB he would have scrambled faster and had better pocket awareness - not to mention we would be 1-0
And when they say the game is won in the trenches...I guess they thought they be lying......I mean anyone that knows football knew the interior lines on both sides of the ball were atrocious.
He'd break the pocket and break his collarbone......Romo would break the pocket and make a play.
He'd break the pocket and break his collarbone......