My Hot Take is that Romo was a very good but not historically great player on a team run by utter morons. Expecting him to be a magical savior of a trash organization, and then being mad when it didn't happen, was just a fundamentally dumb take on things. Everybody isn't Roger Staubach. Also, Roger Staubach is like 76 years old. And Staubach had Landry, just like Aikman had Jimmy Johnson, Brady had Belichick, Montana had Walsh, and so on and so on.
If the Cowboys had a literal living legend of this era like Tom Brady instead of Tony Romo in the 2000s-2010s could they have done better? Sure, why not... but if you're just going to sit around waiting for the new greatest player of his generation to appear in your lap to save you from being stupid about everything, you're probably going to be waiting a long time. In the meantime you should be maximizing what you get out of the kind of players you realistically CAN get, instead of pissing it away trying to party like it's 1992 on offense but with Cole Beasly as your Michael Irvin which lol.