Because the first post was meant as a simple jab at the ranking and anyone who agreed to it. Anyone who read the accompanying article I posted the link to would have known the whole story. I repeat it was a sarcastic remark. I didn't know 2nd grade level linguistics surpassed your all-encompassing intellect.
More spin control, anarchy!!!! I said the spin control was applied to your statement of, I miss nothing. Later to be refined as, I miss nothing when it comes to reading between the lines and intent. Way to miss the point again Hostile. YAY you!
I clarified beyond the point that anybody else would have to. My freaking point is, complete without sarcasm, that Prisco is a moron and therefore his ranking is mostly likely ********. Yet, you have guys who defend it, whereas if they ranking was reversed and it was a perceived slight, those same guys would be saying things like, typical anti-cowboys bias and he's ******** and so is everything he writes.
I'm sorry I didn't bow down to you... But I clearly did say that I didn't mean that the monkey was smarter than Prisco. I clearly posted that it wouldn't matter since it was a random event.
And what translation is that? Because I did say that both translations were correct. Prisco IS a moron and predicting the future (especially in sports) IS difficult. Does that clarify anything for you?
And I clarified the monkey thing as sarcasm. Your so stuck on it that I guess I'll try ONE more time to help you. Prisco is obviously smarter than a primate. A primate can't write an article, no matter how stupid it is. It was a sarcastic jab at prisco. I figured any idiot with common sense could figure that out on their own. Sorry I assumed you had common sense.
