Probowl and Dak

[Philmonroe]

So everything you post, you have nothing, but bias hearsay, since I don't see you posting tape?

You know whats funny the person you quoted said without tape aka proof you have nothing but in another thread this same poster is refusing to post proof and instead post smilies like a teenager on iMessage. Funny how people switch up the rhetoric to fit what junk they are pushing.

 

[Sevenup3000]

Scoring 15 points until the last 6 minutes of the Game, will usually lose you the game in today's high scoring NFL. So while it might be your opinion that Dak didn't lose us that game, that is all it is, an opinion versus the truth. There are plenty of people who think that Dak helped lose us the game for 1) not scoring enough points and 2) having an averse effect on the run game because he did not punish the other team for daring him to throw it passed the 15 yard marker.

Keep talking nonsense. The Rams scored 4 more points (needed overtime) and the Saints scored 1 more point than Dallas the VERY NEXT WEEK...and here's the kicker: both did it without their respective defenses giving up 270 yards and massive TOP advantage to their opponent.

EDIT: Oh, and both those offenses got a turnover too...

 

[Gangsta Spanksta]

Our run d lost it.

are they responsible for only scoring 15 points until the last 6 mins of the fourth quarter?

 

[Gangsta Spanksta]

Dak is the best QB we’ve had in the history of who we have right now.

stats prove he is better than Rodgers, Brady, Brees, so of course he is better than anybody the cowboys ever had.

 

[WillieBeamen]

You used passing yards and TDs from Romo 13 year career in the 4th quarter. Daks has only 3 years, this isn't a hard concept to understand.

Use Romo stats from his first 3 years and not his entire career. I can't make it any more simple for you to understand.

U cant be serious. Read my posts slowly.

Americas Cowboy said Romo was a choke artist. He didnt mention anything about his first 3 years! What arent you understanding about my post??

But since you want to play dumb, and focus in on the totals, ill put this much simpler for you.

Romo:
65 Completion %
66 yds (per 4th quarter)
.5 tds (per 4th quarter)
103 Rating

Ratings:
Trailing < 2 min to go- 101
Trailing < 4 min to go- 96
Tied < 2 min to go- 37
Tied < 4 min to go- 52

Dak:
64 completion %
63 yds (per 4th quarter)
.4 Tds (per 4th quarter)
95 rating

Ratings:
Trailing < 2 min to go- 53
Trailing < 4 min to go- 58
Tied < 2 min to go- 67
Tied < 4min to go- 110

When the game is tied late, Dak is more clutch with his style of play. He isnt a gambler. I will give him that. When we are losing the game late, Romo is more clutch. Which is what ive been saying for years now. His aggressive style would help bring us back.

Now lets see how u and any other Dak stan spins this one. Especially after ive obviously given him credit here.

 

[Gangsta Spanksta]

Dak recently proved you wrong with his performance to end the regular season at the Giants, then he continued it throughout the playoffs this year, so shut it already with your baloney, ok?

You talking about the least important game, against the worst team in our division, as if it were a playoff game.

 

[WillieBeamen]

Okay...reading comprehension...reading comprehension...reading comprehension...

In what world does your response have anything to do with what was posted?

Reading Comprehension.

Who are you? Are you an alias?

Follow along. AC said Romo choked while Dak is clutch. My post shows Romo actually upped his game in the 4th while Dak played worse as far as his career numbers go.


Swing and Miss by you

 

[Gangsta Spanksta]

He needs A weapon-- as in ONE weapon. Anyone trying to call Cooper a "top weapon" after looking at his production with the Raiders is a failure at life.

You don't know the history of the NFL, if you don't know that the raiders are often referred to as the black hole of the NFL. And if you don't know what that means you lack comprehension

 

[WillieBeamen]

You talking about the least important game, against the worst team in our division, as if it were a playoff game.

On top of that, it was one game lol. As if we cant pull up several other games to contradict his point

 

[Gangsta Spanksta]

Keep talking nonsense. The Rams scored 4 more points (needed overtime) and the Saints scored 1 more point than Dallas the VERY NEXT WEEK...and here's the kicker: both did it without their respective defenses giving up 270 yards and massive TOP advantage to their opponent.

EDIT: Oh, and both those offenses got a turnover too...

Did the opposing defenses in those games Dare the quarterback to throw it deep all game long and focused in on stopping the run? Now who is talking nonsense? I mean, what defensive coordinator would actually dare Brees to throw it deep? Have opposing defensive players come out on national TV saying that they have figured out Brees and said that he can't throw it deep? That's what happened to Dak in 2017, he got called out. So maybe what is a problem for Dak isn't a problem for brees, and someone here recently said that Brady these days dink and dunks, sucessfully, as Dak did in 2016. You can sucessfully dink and dunk, and win in this league, as long as you reserve the ability to light someone up deep. The difference is that defenses know that Brady can play the deep game so they play the full field. For Dak they only play two thirds of the field.

 

[Sevenup3000]

Who are you? Are you an alias?

Follow along. AC said Romo choked while Dak is clutch. My post shows Romo actually upped his game in the 4th while Dak played worse as far as his career numbers go.


Swing and Miss by you

I am going to slow this down for you. The stat he posted was limited to 4th quarters...under 7 minutes...and within a score...

You...in your infinite wisdom...decided (because you apparently have reading comprenhension difficulties) to start yapping about 4th Quarter stats...

Put another way, I will use this example as it will likely get you excited: If Dak Prescott was trailing the Eagles by 30 points in the 4th Quarter (that part gets you excited) and throws 3 tds (while still losing by 9 points)...do you think that would undermine the ultimate conclusion that the NFLNETWORK stat was getting at?

There is so much wrong with your response to that post...but cheif among them is not even understanding what that post/stat was getting at.

Now try again.

 

[WillieBeamen]

I am going to slow this down for you. The stat he posted was limited to 4th quarters...under 7 minutes...and within a score...

You...in your infinite wisdom...decided (because you apparently have reading comprenhension difficulties) to start yapping about 4th Quarter stats...

Put another way, I will use this example as it will likely get you excited: If Dak Prescott was trailing the Eagles by 30 points in the 4th Quarter (that part gets you excited) and throws 3 tds (while still losing by 9 points)...do you think that would undermine the ultimate conclusion that the NFLNETWORK stat was getting at?

There is so much wrong with your response to that post...but cheif among them is not even understanding what that post/stat was getting at.

Now try again.

Yeah, no.

The tweet AC quoted was some goofball cherry picked stat to paint Romo in a bad light. What I did, was paint the whole picture of Romo’s 4th quarter play. Its funny that tweet was December 18, 2013, after the loss to Green Bay. You want to know what Romo did the next week? Here it is...



Season on the line...Herniated Disk in his back....4th and Goal from the 10. If we dont score the td, we are eliminated from the playoffs...

Checkmate.


Quit while youre ahead. Im so much better at this than you are

 

[America's Cowboy]

So everything you post, you have nothing, but bias hearsay, since I don't see you posting tape?

I post videos to prove my point. You post caca.

 

[America's Cowboy]

Yeah, no.

The tweet AC quoted was some goofball cherry picked stat to paint Romo in a bad light. What I did, was paint the whole picture of Romo’s 4th quarter play. Its funny that tweet was December 18, 2013, after the loss to Green Bay. You want to know what Romo did the next week? Here it is...



Season on the line...Herniated Disk in his back....4th and Goal from the 10. If we dont score the td, we are eliminated from the playoffs...

Checkmate.


Quit while youre ahead. Im so much better at this than you are

Romo put them in that 8-8 position once again. 3 years in a row of 8-8 with coming short at ends of those seasons to make the playoffs.

 

[WillieBeamen]

Romo put them in that 8-8 position once again. 3 years in a row of 8-8 with coming short at ends of those seasons to make the playoffs.

And none of this nonsense you posted had anything to do with my post....

 

[Sevenup3000]

Did the opposing defenses in those games Dare the quarterback to throw it deep all game long and focused in on stopping the run? Now who is talking nonsense? I mean, what defensive coordinator would actually dare Brees to throw it deep? Have opposing defensive players come out on national TV saying that they have figured out Brees and said that he can't throw it deep? That's what happened to Dak in 2017, he got called out. So maybe what is a problem for Dak isn't a problem for brees, and someone here recently said that Brady these days dink and dunks, sucessfully, as Dak did in 2016. You can sucessfully dink and dunk, and win in this league, as long as you reserve the ability to light someone up deep. The difference is that defenses know that Brady can play the deep game so they play the full field. For Dak they only play two thirds of the field.

Yawn. You and your buddy really need to improve your reading comprehension skills.

Why you are talking about defensive game plans and how defensive coordinators play Dak -- the world will never know.

Getting back to the point that YOU made and that I responded to: YOUR conclusion that Dak (as apparently the sole responsible party) didn't put up enough points ("given today's high powered NFL offenses") is COMPLETELY undermined and destroyed by the VERY NEXT GAME that the Rams played.

Now, let's try to stay on topic and not move goalposts, shall we?

 

[blumayne38]

Didn’t Dak have like a 25 scoreless drive streak or something to that nature.....horrible

 

[WillieBeamen]

Didn’t Dak have like a 25 scoreless drive streak or something to that nature.....horrible

Yep


“But Zeke was suspended!”

“Tyron was hurt!”

“Martin wasnt 100%!”

“LINEHANNN!!!!!”

 

[Irvin88_4life]

U cant be serious. Read my posts slowly.

Americas Cowboy said Romo was a choke artist. He didnt mention anything about his first 3 years! What arent you understanding about my post??

But since you want to play dumb, and focus in on the totals, ill put this much simpler for you.

Romo:
65 Completion %
66 yds (per 4th quarter)
.5 tds (per 4th quarter)
103 Rating

Ratings:
Trailing < 2 min to go- 101
Trailing < 4 min to go- 96
Tied < 2 min to go- 37
Tied < 4 min to go- 52

Dak:
64 completion %
63 yds (per 4th quarter)
.4 Tds (per 4th quarter)
95 rating

Ratings:
Trailing < 2 min to go- 53
Trailing < 4 min to go- 58
Tied < 2 min to go- 67
Tied < 4min to go- 110

When the game is tied late, Dak is more clutch with his style of play. He isnt a gambler. I will give him that. When we are losing the game late, Romo is more clutch. Which is what ive been saying for years now. His aggressive style would help bring us back.

Now lets see how u and any other Dak stan spins this one. Especially after ive obviously given him credit here.

I don't care who is more clutch or not. Problem is you are using stats over a 13 year career compared to only 3 year career. Of course the 13 year career will look better number wise because of the time played. Like I said before if Dak doesn't get any better, which is highly unlikely because he isn't done developing, he will match or surpass Romo totals in the 4th quarter by 3 or 4 years faster. If Dak develops quicker then he will do it another year or so faster.

 

[Romo_To_Dez]

I don't care who is more clutch or not. Problem is you are using stats over a 13 year career compared to only 3 year career. Of course the 13 year career will look better number wise because of the time played. Like I said before if Dak doesn't get any better, which is highly unlikely because he isn't done developing, he will match or surpass Romo totals in the 4th quarter by 3 or 4 years faster. If Dak develops quicker then he will do it another year or so faster.

Reading how this board was towards Romo in 2009, one could have never predicted how he would be built up to a legendary status. A legendary status built up, in large part to diminish the current Cowboys starting QB. It would make more sense to compare Dak with Romo, once Dak has been in the NFL for as long as Romo was.