Probowl and Dak

[blumayne38]

The game vs the Rams wasn't lost because of Dak. TRUTH

Not truth

 

[Ranching]

Dak is the best qb we had since aikman

Stir it up! Let's wake up the haters, I mean, critics! Lol

 

[Ranching]

Dak is the best QB we’ve had in the history of who we have right now.

He's not better than Garrett!!!

 

[DallasEast]

I'm only 1 win away from Dak's playoff win total.

Do I excite you?

I try staying out of the daily Prescott nonsense but THAT is pretty gosh darn funny.

 

[WillieBeamen]

First off you are using Romo entire career to compare to a 3 year player.... Yep that makes sense. Not only that you love to say Dak had 70-80 passer rating but say his 4th quarter rating of 95 is worst....... Don't see it do you. Continue throwing crap at the wall, you might eventually get close

Reading Comprehension isnt your forte, eh?

The post I quoted was that romo wasnt clutch and he was a choke artist etc. and that dak was clutch.

I compared their numbers which shows Romo’s numbers in the 4th quarter are superior to Dak’s, who I have admitted is clutch.

 

[CF74]

And gameday menus!

That’s a given foodie

 

[Ranching]

That’s a given foodie

Barbacoa de lengua a la Mexicana for breakfast!!

 

[CF74]

Barbacoa de lengua a la Mexicana for breakfast!!

Man I now gotta go drive down to the local Michoacana Carniceria, thanks....

 

[WillieBeamen]

First off I never said it was different. You are the one choosing to use certain games and then entire year not me. You going to use the entire year this season then use the entire season all 3 years chump.

Yep Miles Austin......... Don't forget to add TO, Roy Williams, Dez, Witten. Funny you want to pick miles Austin even though a ton of his years came from...... Here the kicker, yac.

You obviously are having a hard time following along. This is what happens when you fight other poster’s battles.

The poster I originally quoted, basically was saying how Romo had superior weapons than Dak in his tenure. While that may be true, I pointed out the fact that Dak has had Zeke. I also pointed out that Dak hasnt been the same QB without Zeke.

Romo has made it happen, with different receivers, different backs, and some terrible offensive lines. Dak on the other hand, gets every excuse from this fanbase when he doesnt perform well. I chose to show the stats dak put up without Zeke, to show that he’s needed for Dak to play at a competent level.

 

[Ranching]

@Philmonroe good morning sunshine! Salud!!

 

[America's Cowboy]

You obviously are having a hard time following along. This is what happens when you fight other poster’s battles.

The poster I originally quoted, basically was saying how Romo had superior weapons than Dak in his tenure. While that may be true, I pointed out the fact that Dak has had Zeke. I also pointed out that Dak hasnt been the same QB without Zeke.

Romo has made it happen, with different receivers, different backs, and some terrible offensive lines. Dak on the other hand, gets every excuse from this fanbase when he doesnt perform well. I chose to show the stats dak put up without Zeke, to show that he’s needed for Dak to play at a competent level.

Dak recently proved you wrong with his performance to end the regular season at the Giants, then he continued it throughout the playoffs this year, so shut it already with your baloney, ok?

 

[Irvin88_4life]

Reading Comprehension isnt your forte, eh?

The post I quoted was that romo wasnt clutch and he was a choke artist etc. and that dak was clutch.

I compared their numbers which shows Romo’s numbers in the 4th quarter are superior to Dak’s, who I have admitted is clutch.

And you don't get showing 13 years of stats is always going to be more than 3 years of stats. That's the most dumbest thing I have ever heard. Show the first 3 years of Romo compared to Daks 3 years. If you don't get that then there is no reason to keep talking to you because you refuse to look at facts because your hate for Dak is so strong.

 

[WillieBeamen]

And you don't get showing 13 years of stats is always going to be more than 3 years of stats. That's the most dumbest thing I have ever heard. Show the first 3 years of Romo compared to Daks 3 years. If you don't get that then there is no reason to keep talking to you because you refuse to look at facts because your hate for Dak is so strong.

Yo what are u talking about Duke, lol?

Once again, the poster I was responding to, claimed Romo was a choke artist and Dak was clutch. I showed Romo (the guy he said was unclutch) stats compared to Dak (the guy he said was clutch), to show that his assertion made no sense. I also admitted Dak was clutch. And you obviously dont know how to analyze stats, because I also included Efficiency numbers (completion %, ypa, and passer rating) which has nothing to do with longevity

 

[WillieBeamen]

Dak recently proved you wrong with his performance to end the regular season at the Giants, then he continued it throughout the playoffs this year, so shut it already with your baloney, ok?

I clearly mentioned that in an earlier post.

Out of 8 games without Zeke, Dak has had two good games. Both of them came against the lousy Giants teams

There is more evidence that he needs Zeke than the other way around

 

[Irvin88_4life]

Yo what are u talking about Duke, lol?

Once again, the poster I was responding to, claimed Romo was a choke artist and Dak was clutch. I showed Romo (the guy he said was unclutch) stats compared to Dak (the guy he said was clutch), to show that his assertion made no sense. I also admitted Dak was clutch. And you obviously dont know how to analyze stats, because I also included Efficiency numbers (completion %, ypa, and passer rating) which has nothing to do with longevity

You used passing yards and TDs from Romo 13 year career in the 4th quarter. Daks has only 3 years, this isn't a hard concept to understand.

Use Romo stats from his first 3 years and not his entire career. I can't make it any more simple for you to understand.

 

[Sevenup3000]

No, you made a goofy point to go along with a goofy thread and I called you out on it.


Dak had a 86.6 passer rating in his second season. That had him ranked 16th overall. This was when he didnt have Zeke for 6 of the games (his passer rating in those 6 games was 76.6)

You moved goalposts and said he was top 5 in the goofy espn stat QBR.

To diminish your point, I asked you what was his QBR this past season. He was ranked 17th which is why you didnt want to answer my question.

His passer rating was 87.4 the games without Amari Cooper, this past season. This is proving my point. He needs top weapons at the skills position to look decent. Alfred Morris averaged more ypc than Zeke last season, and Dak still looked bad without Zeke.

He needs A weapon-- as in ONE weapon. Anyone trying to call Cooper a "top weapon" after looking at his production with the Raiders is a failure at life.

 

[Gangsta Spanksta]

Our run d lost it.

The most important thing about being clutch is actually winning the game.

 

[Sevenup3000]

Goofy Post


4th quarter Stats:
Romo:
65% completion
9202 yards
8.4 ypa
75 Tds
30 Int
103 rating

Dak:
64% completion
3179 yards
7.7 ypa
20 Tds
9 Int
95 rating

One of these QBs played better than their career average in the 4th quarter, while the other played worse

Okay...reading comprehension...reading comprehension...reading comprehension...

In what world does your response have anything to do with what was posted?

Reading Comprehension.

 

[Gangsta Spanksta]

The game vs the Rams wasn't lost because of Dak. TRUTH

Scoring 15 points until the last 6 minutes of the Game, will usually lose you the game in today's high scoring NFL. So while it might be your opinion that Dak didn't lose us that game, that is all it is, an opinion versus the truth. There are plenty of people who think that Dak helped lose us the game for 1) not scoring enough points and 2) having an averse effect on the run game because he did not punish the other team for daring him to throw it passed the 15 yard marker.

 

[Gangsta Spanksta]

Without tape, you've got nothing. Absolutely nothing but biased heresay.

So everything you post, you have nothing, but bias hearsay, since I don't see you posting tape?