This is the thinking that kills this team. The answer was that Austin was underutilized and the coaches didn't give him the opportuntity to take over Crayton spot in 2007 or 2008. If you have a ffranchse QB, he should be able to make the WRs better (See Manning>Garcon>Collie, Brady>Edelman, etc). Sure, salary wise it was a wash this year if you flipped the stats, but the bigger picture is NOW you have to pay Austin like #1, You gave up 2 picks last year that could have garned Harvin and OL help, etc.
The biggest problem I have with the team is its propencity to not play young guys and stick with older vets (and then overpay to keep them). Look at how Free played, likely overpaid for Flozell and Colombo. Look at Felix and Choice and their underutilization as coaches defer to an injured Barber in 2008 and 2009 based on salary. Look at Ogletree, look at Spencer and Ellis (imagine if spencer came on in late 2008 like late 2009).
Roy was a knee-jerk reaction to take away double coverage from TO to help strech the field when the answer was sitting on the bench since 2006. Now you lose on 2 draft picks and are strapped at the WR position if/when the cap comes back as you are paying 2 #1s. All the while, Ogletree is being underutilized and that type of WR is sorely lacking (quick, fast, smaller, etc).
The turnover of vets and rosters, I believe, keeps everyone on their game more consistently. Now when a vet gets a contract in Dallas, there is no worry about losing playing time, no worry about being cut and as long as they ramp it up in a contract year they get extended.
There is a happy medium between Philly and NE and Dallas.
You can say hindsight is 20/20 with Austin, but if you remember the hype 2008 was how he lit up Ttraining Camp. Then, he smoked GB in week 3, then hardly played against Wash through rest of the year. Coaches are paid to see and use this potential. HEre we get talent and then defer to a contract