Hiero
New Member
- Messages
- 3,075
- Reaction score
- 0
I just did.Hostile said:If you say so.
I just did.Hostile said:If you say so.
Yeah I know. I figure if you say so it has to be true. After all, you are the QB consultant for Sean Payton, et al. From now on, I'll ignore Parcells and Jerry when they talk about him and refer all progress on our QBs to your report.Hiero said:I just did.
Hostile said:If Henson had as much PT as Losman he'd be further along than Losman.
I call that getting a chance.
Alexander said:And how do you know this?
Getting a chance in what way? Would you play him tomorrow if Bledsoe got hurt? Would you just throw caution to the wind and decide the day the season ends that Henson is going to get his chance come hell or highwater as Buffalo did?
Henson's "chance" comes in the form of him earning a backup spot. Other chances need to perhaps come in Europe. You don't put developmental "chances" out there when you are trying to build a champion. Buffalo is living breathing proof of that.
It's called an opinion. Nobody can know for sure, I just dont see anything happening with Henson. Obviously you're a henson fan.Hostile said:Yeah I know. I figure if you say so it has to be true. After all, you are the QB consultant for Sean Payton, et al. From now on, I'll ignore Parcells and Jerry when they talk about him and refer all progress on our QBs to your report.
Doomsday101 said:Honestly none of us can make a true statement in regards to Henson because we don't know how he is progressing at this stage and Bill clearly is not going to talk about this issue during the middle of the season. One way or the other I think Henson future will be determined during this upcoming off-season and training camp.
Alexander said:I agree. I am not saying he will make it or won't.
I am saying I really don't care unless he can go out and earn it. You don't hand something over to someone who hasn't earned it just because they have this "pedigree" thing or that we spent a draft choice.
Alexander said:I agree. I am not saying he will make it or won't.
I am saying I really don't care unless he can go out and earn it. You don't hand something over to someone who hasn't earned it just because they have this "pedigree" thing or that we spent a draft choice. If that's the case, Stephen Peterman has pedigree and we need to play him instead of the two other guards we start. He hasn't earned it and therefore he doesn't play.
It is up to him to compete and win something. A backup job is the first step.
YoMick said:It seems that that happens very often in the NFL. You have a "pedigree" and you are handed the reigns to the offense and they TRY to build it around you as you learn. ala Eli Manning and others
Obviously I am. If you read closely though I am not saying absolutely one way or the other what will happen with him. You're throwing out an absolute. Therein lies the difference.Hiero said:It's called an opinion. Nobody can know for sure, I just dont see anything happening with Henson. Obviously you're a henson fan.
I never said I know it, but I do think he has much better tools than Losman.Alexander said:And how do you know this?
If Bledsoe got hurt, yes I would play Henson and let him sink or swim.Getting a chance in what way? Would you play him tomorrow if Bledsoe got hurt? Would you just throw caution to the wind and decide the day the season ends that Henson is going to get his chance come hell or highwater as Buffalo did?
He's already earned a backup spot. Evidenced by the fact he has a roster spot. If it is a crime for me to think he's got something by all means press charges. I'll plead guilty and save the trial.Henson's "chance" comes in the form of him earning a backup spot. Other chances need to perhaps come in Europe. You don't put developmental "chances" out there when you are trying to build a champion. Buffalo is living breathing proof of that.
You'll never hear me pan the idea of getting better at any position. No matter how much I like Henson, if we can get someone better, get him.Hiero said:honestly even if I did think Henson had a chance to be starting QB i'd still love to bring someone else young in to compete with him. I don't want to take a chance on such a big risk, the risk that a guy who's quit football for baseball can ever turn back into a football player. Very high risk that he will ever be starter, although i love that we took a shot on getting him. I want to know for sure that when Parcells leaves or by the end of next year who our future QB is. I dont want to keep hoping and dreaming Henson can turn it around without bringing in someone else as insurance.
really hard to tell who is "better" perse but someone of equal talent to compete with him at the very least as insurance/backup plan not putting your eggs all in one basket whatever ya wanna call it.Hostile said:You'll never hear me pan the idea of gettign better at any position. No matter how much I like Henson, if we can get someone better, get him.
I agree with you on the timing. Henson better prove something or we need to get someone else in there to compete in 2006 draft, and at the very latest 2007.Nors said:Bledsoe beat out Romo
Romo beat out Henson year 2
Henson has started 8 1/2 games since 1997. Thats going on 9 years ago.
Year 3 is the year to Show Parcells something. Thats his big line.....
kartr said:When you laugh at him and laugh at me, you're laughing at our lack of success without him and that's just dumb in wanting to lose without him instead of winning with him. Sad and pathetic fans you are.
sorry, my badHostile said:Someone left the gate open again.