Discussion in 'Fan Zone' started by aria, Aug 15, 2019.
There is always an agenda when people freak out like that.
Yep. The agenda of Dallas playing starters against the Rams backups gives people all kind of storylines.
Dallas wins big: “of course they should have.”
Dallas barely wins: “They barely beat backups.”
Dallas loses: “They can’t even beat backups.”
Dallas loses big: “Hahahahhaah, they really suck!”
It doesn’t matter the outcome. There still is reason to bash Dallas... which is all a lot of people want.
Therefore, it is important to some people that it is starters vs. backups.
They need to cut preseason to two games.
Will the field in Honolulu be better than that goat pasture we played on in the playoffs?
Wrong, it was your snarky arrogant reply which again you refuse to acknowledge. Whatever...you win. Now get back to telling us how awesome you are...see now that’s a sarcastic joke, please don’t.
That is not in the Cowboys DNA
If you read my posts both of you would know there is no agenda and I clearly stated why I believe in playing starters unless they are hurt but carry on with your own justifications and assumptions that you know other peoples motives or thoughts without actually asking them.
Of course I did I already clearly spell it out in this thread so perhaps reading comprehension is the problem here.
Who cares? Cowboys can't control that. If you're butt hurt over that just stay in your Mom's basement.
I was talking about a guy I work with.
I apologize if I misinterpreted your comments but you’re agreeing with a dbag I’ve been arguing with who is clearly referring to me and what I said which is also what you happened to reference (with regards to not playing starters).
Yeah, I get it. It just reminded me of the guy I work with, so that’s what I was talking about. My first post talks about it but my second doesn’t.