For sure, and it's true in every sport, really. I would also say that a year as a pro is going to get you more physical development than a year in college just because you have more free time (although that might depend on how much schooling a player actually does lol).I agree. The argument really shouldn't be about is this true or not but to what extent it's true. Especially the younger a player is. I can go watch a single A minor league baseball game where scouts rave out this 20-year-old that is tearing up the league, but hardly care about the 21-year-old with similar numbers because hes "old for the league". As you get into the mid 20s the difference isn't as drastic but still needs to be factored into the equation. I think age and how long they've been in school matter in regard to these drills. A 5th year senior has had 5 years with college trainers to prep specifically for these drills and have gone over technique time and time again. Once these guys get into the league they don't care about their 40 times, and specific techniques to run the 3 cone as they'll never run these again.
Nah hurdling another grown man is on another level. Schoonbummer can't even break a tackleEven average NFL athletes are amazing physical specimens. That’s about the only explanation I got for ya.
It's not about faster, it's about more explosive. Broad, vertical, even 3-cone can all improve.
They're professional athletes. The ones who don't develop physically don't have long careers.
I think there’s a lot of players that could hurdle other guys if they wanted to. They just don’t want to risk the injury.Nah hurdling another grown man is on another level. Schoonbummer can't even break a tackle
Ok sure.Im not saying they don’t improve. They can
That being said. Schoonmaker being a couple years older doesnt itself alone explain why his RAS is so high compared to Ferguson for example. No matter what Ferguson does he is not going to match him athletically.
There are other factors that affect it as well besides age. Like genetics, injury history, work ethic/training ethic, etc.
I think there’s a lot of players that could hurdle other guys if they wanted to. They just don’t want to risk the injury.
Teams could save a lot of time and money.Nah hurdling another grown man is on another level. Schoonbummer can't even break a tackle
Thanks for sharing your opinion. I’m gonna wait until I see them both on an NFL field to make my conclusion though.Ok sure.
Ferguson had a poor RAS who plays like a better athlete, and Schoon is a high RAS who plays like a worse athlete. Fundamentally, they're the same player on game day, as it relates to athleticism.
You are wildly misrepresenting what I said.Thanks for sharing your opinion. I’m gonna wait until I see them both on an NFL field to make my conclusion though.
Rather than rely on your “well he is older so he scored better on the RAS” assumption.
You are wildly misrepresenting what I said.
The RAS part, as it relates to age.You said they’re fundamentally the same
Player on game day. I said I’m going to wait until I see them both on an NFL field before I make that determination.
The RAS part, as it relates to age.
I wouldn't say it's like Money Ball. It's more like Power Ball.Why can’t people accept that drafting is an inexact science based on many unknowns. They measure arm length in 1/8ths of inches…...1/8th... I’ve got fingernails longer than that. This is the football version of MoneyBall.
Teams look for any metrics that could improve the success of prospect evaluations. Agree or disagree, the people making the evaluations place some degree of weight on these metrics. They leave no stone unturned if they think it can improve their odds.
haha yes yes, that was what i was going for!
He’s also making $10M less than SchultzSchoonmaker doesn't play like a RAS guy. He's also 1000 years old, so he's pretty much fully developed athletically.
That said, he can go make all of the same plays in the passing game that Schultz did.
But this just isn’t reality. If that were true, Nathaniel Dell and Charlie Jones should have been the first receivers off the board. The reality is teams have to make determinations on whether college production will transfer to the pro’s. Like it or not, athleticism is one of many metrics teams use to identify potentially transferable skill sets.If a player produced enough, RAS wouldn't even be a part of the discussion because production is all that matters.
I think you misunderstand RAS. Athleticism is something that NFL teams deem an important variable when competing against the best players in the world.RAS is basically just saying "this could be good" so I'm gonna gamble and hope it is