masomenos
Less is more
- Messages
- 5,983
- Reaction score
- 33
AKATheRake;3372155 said:Answer to 1st bolded point: Haha, was talking with DaBoyz there on his response to my response of your statement. Questioned if he was being sarcastic
Answer to 2nd bolded point: I agree. But its tougher to have to locate, then catch a faster, more deceitful, better placed ball from a better informed QB than not.
Answer to 3rd bolded point: No, it wouldn't be. But the odds of a QB from a smaller schools overall level of reading defenses, accuracy, throwing power, deceiving defenses and decision making are far less common than those of the QB's in the ranks of where Berry and Thomas had to play.
So those are the types of balls that had to be located in the backfield and then have a play made on.
See, I think the disconnect we're having is based on the definition of ball skills. It seems like your tying ball skills and recognition/being in position into an inclusive package. The grades that ESPN gave are independent, the ball skills is just defined as when the player is around the ball and there's a separate grade for instincts, which includes a players ability to read the QB and be in the right positions. There's no doubt that Thomas and Berry are more ready to face NFL defenses because they are more likely to be in the right spot on any given play. Thomas had a score of 1 for instincts, Berry a score of 2 and AOA a score of 3.
Oh and I know you weren't being sarcastic, I'm not sure if Daboyz was being serious or not either lol.
