Boyzmamacita;2640798 said:Are you kidding? Those Cowboys had their fair share of folks who had run-ins with the law back then. Hollywood Henderson, Bob Hayes, Rafael Septien, Lance Rentzel. I could go on. Every team has individuals who make bonehead mistakes and break the law. I became a Cowboys fan because I fell in love with a guy named Tony Hill, then came to realize that the guys around him were pretty special too. They weren't perfect and they weren't saints. Who is? But they filled the hearts of a teenage girl who was just learning about football. I've been hooked ever since and I would never stop being a fan because Michael Irvin got caught with drugs or because Pacman and Tank Johnson were signed. I've been a fan of the team and the organization for 30 years and counting. I don't understand the jump ship mentality just because a few individuals are not perfect.
Wrangler87;2640774 said:yep.
I said it before and I'll say it again. This is the only guy on the planet that we could sign that would cause me to stop cheering for the Cowboys after 23 years. Though never proven guilty, I feel he was directly related to the outcome of the crime he was accused of and used his assets to get himself off the hook. I can not possibly allow myself to cheer for an individual that I feel was involved in a crime of that magnitude.
Had I known then what I know now about Pacman, I might have done it last year.
You have to draw the line somewhere. Some things are bigger than NFL football.
When I was 8 years old, I picked the Cowboys as my favorite team because they were the good guys. The Landry's, White's Dorsett's and Staubach's. The represented what was good about heroes. Over the years this team has changed. Now we are known as the team that will sign the biggest thug available. I can live with that to some extent. But, with Ray Lewis, I will draw the line.
tyke1doe;2640813 said:Don't take this personally.
I work with cops, and I've covered civil and criminal cases.
I also have some understanding how interrogations work. Lawyers and police officers aren't unaffected by politics anymore than the rest of us. And if there's a person who is a celebrity involved in a high-profile case, they're going to look at that person. It's called getting the big fish, and in this case, Ray Lewis was the big fish.
Second, if this is your world, then you know that the civil and criminal systems are different animals.
Of course, the families of the two victims (Jacinth Baker and Richard Lollar) can sue Ray Lewis in civil court. They merely have to argue that Ray Lewis was someway involved in a crime that resulted in the death of their loved ones. And since he has money, the victims' families are going to go after Ray Lewis. That doesn't mean that he committed the crimes. All it means is that he attempted to shield the true perpetrators from justice.
The burden of proof is different in a criminal trial compared to a civil trial.
A criminal trial tries to determine if you were a participant in a crime; the civil trial tries to determine if you are in any way a responsible party whether you committed the crime or not.
BraveHeartFan;2640859 said:But you were perfectly ok when it was star players only snorting coke, screwing hookers, being accused of raping a chick, stabbing their own teammates, and stuff like that.
You were ok with all of that, none of that was going to make you stop being a fan, but someone being allegedly involved in a murder and by God, no matter that there was never any evidence to actually prove he was a murder, you're turning in the fan card. Getting out of here as quick as you can in that instance huh?
Well, that's cool, I'm sure the Carolina Panthers could use another fan. They only had a player actually get convicted of having his girlfriend, who was pregnant, killed.
I was about to post that. It's not as though it happened or was known while he was playing.Wrangler87;2640857 said:What's your point. I don't answer to you. I simply stated a fact. We sign Lewis, I'm through with them. If we don't, then great, good choice, and maybe we are learning something. Where any of the Cowboys of the 70's and 80's involved in the death of other people. What Septian did was terrible, but did not come out until later.
Wrangler87;2640854 said:I don't see how you can even exist in that world and be as naive as you appear to be.
5Countem5;2640883 said:Requiring proof before believing something is not naive.
I'm skeptical of everything - that's my world.
Wrangler87;2640885 said:Yeah. If you live your life requiring proof to come to every conclusion you ever come to.
Wrangler87;2640865 said:Maybe I do more than just work with Cops. I know how this all works. I live it on a daily basis. It is my world and if you are naive you will be made a fool.
You don't have to be a genius to read the tea leaves on the Lewis episode.
You can try to explain off each individual part of the case, but when you take the whole episode in it's entirety, it points you in only one direction.
You can choose to believe what you want. I see it for what it is.
Wrangler87;2640857 said:What's your point. I don't answer to you. I simply stated a fact. We sign Lewis, I'm through with them. If we don't, then great, good choice, and maybe we are learning something. Were any of the Cowboys of the 70's and 80's involved in the death of other people. What Septian did was terrible, but did not come out until later.
Boyzmamacita;2640939 said:My point is that the Landry Cowboys had just as many issues as the current Cowboys. So did the Jimmy Johnson Cowboys. The difference is we were winning then. If we had just won the Super Bowl, I bet you wouldn't be contemplating jumping ship for any reason whatsoever. That's my point.
Now, maybe, one witness recants or changes testimony. That's believeable. But every last one?
tyke1doe;2640762 said:Ray Lewis didn't murder anyone. Obstructing justice? Yes. But he was no murderer.
The Fulton County DA's office was quick to charge Ray with murder (trying to seize upon a celebrity), but anyone who followed that case knew that was an idiotic charge and the DA had no chance of getting a murder conviction.
But let's not let the facts get in the way of a good conspiracy rant.
Doomsday101;2640952 said:If you were a problem player under Landry you did not stay around very long.
Boyzmamacita;2640939 said:My point is that the Landry Cowboys had just as many issues as the current Cowboys. So did the Jimmy Johnson Cowboys. The difference is we were winning then. If we had just won the Super Bowl, I bet you wouldn't be contemplating jumping ship for any reason whatsoever. That's my point.
Boyzmamacita;2640962 said:I agree. He got rid of both Duane Thomas and Hollywood Henderson. But the fact is, we had problem players back then too. Several people on this board have threatened to "turn in their fan card." Why jump ship now if you didn't back then? I certainly wouldn't let Ray Lewis or any other individual influence my fandom. But that's just me, I guess.
True, but I still stick to my winning is the best deodorant theory. Pittsburgh beating us to six has some folks standing on the ledge. If we were successful right now, no one would be *****ing and moaning about TO, Pacman, Tank, Romo, Ray Lewis or anybody else.GimmeTheBall!;2640966 said:Actually, sorry to further dispell the Landry Myth: From the late 1970s to 1989 when Jimma and jerra arrived, landry won squat. They sure were not winning then and they still had characters.
Spectre;2640805 said:I know this guy...
who works at Walmart. And he sold toilet paper to this lady who's married to this other guy who works on a golf course... and he overheard these 2 guys talking about this girl who waits tables at this place where this guy and his wife were talking about this man who drives a cab and ran into this dude who works for this other guy that knows this person who talked to this boy that delivers pizza to this woman who said she heard the Dallas Cowboys are going to trade for Peyton Manning.