I said it's hard to evaluate the team the way the game unfolded. Most people would realize the way the game unfolded would speak to how and in what order.
Huh? If you look at the game and each play, if you look at how mistakes were made, you can understand how the game unfolded.
Always love moving goal posts. You say that it's a mentality why we turnover the ball and commit penalties. I give you facts that show we actually did very well last year in turnover margin and you move the argument to missing the playoffs.
Good show.
You also love inventions of your own imagination.
First, you do understand multiple points don't you? A person offers multiple points because an issue is NEVER a matter of a single point.
Second, what good is it to have a positive turnover rate if you miss the playoffs? The object is not to get more turnovers than your opponent. The objection of professional football is to WIN games and make the playoffs, giving one a chance to get to the Super Bowl. It's kind of like pointing to Tony Romo's passing rating, and then arguing he's a winner.
Third, my point STILL stands. What good is it to point to turnover margin if we're not winning? And if you're not winning despite being in a positive situation concerning winning the turnover margin, something is wrong. And that's what you need to assess. And I
DID mention the playoffs in my original assessment. That's not moving the goal post. That's moving to the end zone, which is something we're not doing more than the teams we play.
Some of you are so obsessed with stats. But I understand that's all you have when your team, when our team is not winning. The bottom line, no matter how many stats you trot out, is that the Cowboys have been a consistently mediocre franchise and has loss critical games, resulting in NO PLAYOFFS. Your rebuttal is like pointing out how great the shiny brass door knobs are on the Titanic. Uh, okay, great. But the ship is still sinking.
