superpunk
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 26,330
- Reaction score
- 75
InmanRoshi said:Anything outside of the shallow flat isn't their problem.
Pfffft...
InmanRoshi said:Anything outside of the shallow flat isn't their problem.
InmanRoshi said:If the stats show that you're consistent, then you are consistent.
InmanRoshi said:He made the Pro Bowl alternate as a rookie. Despite his supposed "off year" in 2004, Joyner's book proved he still performed like a Top 10 CB. Last year he was unbelievable. He shut down the best WR in the league to the point where he spontaneously combusted. I can't wait for my copy of Joyner's book to come in the mail next month to see how superior he actually was to the field. You can diminish stats all you want, but it holds a hell of a lot more water than "Chris McAllister is good because I've heard it repeated so many times it has to be true."
Newman doesn't need to prove anything. He's already there.
Even if they are from a small sample of three years?
Certainly not.............I agree, but calling him the Best Cover Corner last year is pure homerism.Vintage said:IMO, people are getting mixed up in differentiating between being a top corner or playing like a top corner.
Silly as it may seem, there is a difference.
IMO, Newman PLAYED like a top corner last season. He had a terrific year. Few, if any CB's had better seasons.
However, he is not a top 2-3 CornerBack yet. A top CB, IMO, is someone who has played at a high level for a couple of years.
Newman played great last season. He didn't play as great in 2004, hence, why we cannot really consider him the best/one of the best CBs in the league right now.
But its certainly not a stretch (or being a homer) to say he played like a top corner last year.
If he does it again, I'd move up him up.....
Charles said:but I guess Newman does it on his own(ps Iman - just replyin general not you specifically).
Charles said:![]()
I love it.............The game in which Terence Newman shut down the best WR in the league (causing his combustion), I hope we somehow don't forget to mention that a certain No.94 had set up shop in the Panthers backfield....
Fla Cowpoke said:How many years has he played? I don't think we can use anything but the three years he has been in the league.
Big Ben must be considered among the top QB's in the league. His winning record supports that. Hall of Fame? Well, I think he needs a few more years.
I am not ready to put Newman in the Hall of Fame and I don't think anyone is suggesting that.
And I hope that we somehow dont forget that Delhomme still passed for 260 yards in that game even with 94 camped in his backfield.
The Panthers were completing passes ... just not on Newman's man.
Charles said:Certainity not.............I agree, but calling him the Best Cover Corner last year is pure homerism.
wileedog said:I think it was Dan Pompei of TSN who ranked out all the CBs at the end of the season.
By his projections T-New graded out as the best pure coverage corner in the league. Other CBs were ranked higher overall because of better run support, etc, but on pure coverage ability Newman was ranked #1.
So when did he mysteriously become a Cowboys Homer?
Charles said:Certainly not.............I agree, but calling him the Best Cover Corner last year is pure homerism.
Alexander said:Conversely, when did his opinion mysteriously become something that is relevant?
Oh wait, when he ranks Newman the best and I agree with it. That's right.
Alexander said:Conversely, when did his opinion mysteriously become something that is relevant?
Oh wait, when he ranks Newman the best and I agree with it. That's right.
wileedog said:Charles' point is that only a homer would rank Newman as the best cover corner.
Dan Pompei ranked Newman as the best cover corner.
So either:
A) Charles is wrong, and the opinion has some validity or
B) Pompei is a Cowboys Homer.
My point is not that Newman was the best cover corner because Pompei said so.
My point is that having the opinion that Newman was the best coverage corner in the league last year is shared by someone who has nothing to do with the Cowboys. Thus blind accusations of homerism tend to lose a little of their weight.
So what are you insinuating. Newman's performance was better that Ware's because even though Ware took over a game defensively (something Newman has never done in his career) Delhomme still passed for 260 yards.InmanRoshi said:And I hope that we somehow dont forget that Delhomme still passed for 260 yards in that game even with Ware camped in his backfield.
..........because if we really get into that 260 yard pasing performance you'll come up with 2 big plays, less than 50% completion percentage and you'd also realize that the Panthers coaching staff had to attack our secondary due to Anthony Henry's absence. They went after the weak links in the secondary.InmanRoshi said:The Panthers were completing passes ... just not on Newman's man.