The United States Government disagrees.
That's not the point in this thread.
Jones' issue deals with the drug policy. Brady's issue is that he cheated. The NFLPA argued that the ruling against Brady was inconsistent with other equipment tampering charges. The league's office argued that it had to do with Brady unwillingness to cooperate (aka lying to investigators). The judge had some silly notion that because Brady gave partial cooperation that he 'cooperated.' Try telling that to the police in a criminal investigation.
You just can't help but show how factually incorrect you are about such a wide variety of topics, can you?
?
You're the one that gets constantly owned on these forums and everybody laughs at your errors, time and time again.
Brady and Jones are two completely different scenarios. The league suspended Brady because he cheated and they felt they had the right to do so for 4-games under the CBA. Cheating in this manner is not very clear under the rules of the CBA. Mainly because most players and coaches have integrity and don't want to hurt the game. The Patriots and Brady are different in that manner.
Jones is a drug issue (I don't even know if synthetic marijuana is against the drug policy). The simple fact is that the drug policy is clearly defined in the CBA and unless Jones has prior failed tests...he's not going to get suspended. Acting like he would is funny because you are the one that claims that I have a persecution complex.
As I've said many times before, it's a sledgehammer and glass house scenario with you.
YR