Bob Sacamano
Benched
- Messages
- 57,084
- Reaction score
- 3
the ABryant comparison is a bit extreme, WG
dude yelled at coaches, that's taking it well past pointing fingers
dude yelled at coaches, that's taking it well past pointing fingers
How is that extreme? I'm only referring to the lack of maturity shown.Bob Sacamano;2031230 said:the ABryant comparison is a bit extreme, WG
dude yelled at coaches, that's taking it well past pointing fingers
WoodysGirl;2031233 said:How is that extreme? I'm only referring to the lack of maturity shown.
And yesterday, if the reports are accurate, he was yelling at coaches. He was throwing a fit. He was throwing a big time temper tantrum.
Not saying he's known for that kind of thing or that he's done it consistently throughout his OU tenure. Just that YESTERDAY, he was AB-like.
exlaxtreme? ugh... :laugh2:Bob Sacamano;2031237 said:X-gamestreme!!! stream! exlaxtreme! you!
WoodysGirl;2031233 said:How is that extreme? I'm only referring to the lack of maturity shown.
And yesterday, if the reports are accurate, he was yelling at coaches. He was throwing a fit. He was throwing a big time temper tantrum.
Not saying he's known for that kind of thing or that he's done it consistently throughout his OU tenure. Just that YESTERDAY, he was AB-like.
WoodysGirl;2031233 said:How is that extreme? I'm only referring to the lack of maturity shown.
And yesterday, if the reports are accurate, he was yelling at coaches. He was throwing a fit. He was throwing a big time temper tantrum.
Not saying he's known for that kind of thing or that he's done it consistently throughout his OU tenure. Just that YESTERDAY, he was AB-like.
I'm one year removed from High school. I would not be doing that. He just needs to shut up.DaBoys4Life;2031379 said:We do have to remember that some of these guys are 3 years removed from high school so it's not like they have that much real life experience and add that to the millions they make at such young ages explains a lot
Chocolate Lab;2031391 said:Not trying to pile on too much here, but what do things like "Torching Miami for three TDs" (a very bad Miami team, BTW) have to do with Kelly throwing a tantrum and running like a sloth at his Pro Day workout?
And why would this guy let some innuendo from a few players turn him against OU's S&T coach?
That post just didn't make any sense. Is he really saying that MK was permanently damaged by an evil and uncaring training staff?
If so, then why was Kelly claiming he ran a 4.5 or so just a couple weeks ago?
TheCount;2029914 said:Good to see he has his eyes on what's important.
ABQcowboyJR;2031381 said:I'm one year removed from High school. I would not be doing that. He just needs to shut up.
You know, I really didn't mind that time either precisely because of Boldin's example. It was Kelly's tantrum afterwards that's causing everyone to pile on. I don't recall Boldin throwing everyone at FSU under the bus after his workout.......Rack;2032481 said:
As if money wouldn't be a concern for you when doing a job interview.
I was never as high on Kelly as some of the OU homers here have been, but I'm not nearly as down on him as some of you others. He ran a 4.7... so what? So did Anquan Boldin (and they have similiar builds).
I'd take him in the 3rd if he's still there. As long as his knees check out.
Originally Posted by The Profit
I have been selling artificial turf for 27 years, and there is a difference in speed from one surface to the next.
The artificial turf, inside the OU practice facility, is from a company called SafePlay. At one time, Barry Switzer was a spokesman for the company. All in-filled synthetic turf (2 inch to 2.5 inch fiber with a sand-rubber or rubber only infill) is not the same. The product inside the practice facility does not contain a mixed infill. It is rubber only, which makes it very comfortable, but extremely slow, especially when compared to AstroTurf. AstroTurf is a 1/2 inch fibered product that is normally installed over a .700 inch pvc/nitrile rubber foam pad. There was a time when AstroTurf dominated the US marketplace (50-60 fields installed per year when the entire US marketplace was 70-80 fields per year). Today's US market for synthetic turf is approximately 600 fields per year and 580 of those are the new long fibered in-filled turf. AstroTurf is still sold, but not really for football. It is a popular surface for field hockey, primarily on the east coast.
NFL fields are either FieldTurf (a name brand) or Sportexe. Both of these systems are much faster than the surface inside the OU practice facility, but neither is as fast as AstroTurf.
Starting that all in-filled varieties of synthetic turf is FieldTurf is like stating that all copiers are Xerox, or all facial tissues are Kleenex.
Kelley will undoubtedly run a faster 40 if he indeed runs it on AstroTurf. It would be hard to find a surface that would be much slower to run on (except muddy natural grass) than the indoor turf at OU's practice center.
I hope this helps to clear things up a little.
Okay...IF what this guy says is true...Kelly might have a legitimate gripe...Originally Posted by The Profit
I have been selling artificial turf for 27 years, and there is a difference in speed from one surface to the next.
The artificial turf, inside the OU practice facility, is from a company called SafePlay. At one time, Barry Switzer was a spokesman for the company. All in-filled synthetic turf (2 inch to 2.5 inch fiber with a sand-rubber or rubber only infill) is not the same. The product inside the practice facility does not contain a mixed infill. It is rubber only, which makes it very comfortable, but extremely slow, especially when compared to AstroTurf. AstroTurf is a 1/2 inch fibered product that is normally installed over a .700 inch pvc/nitrile rubber foam pad. There was a time when AstroTurf dominated the US marketplace (50-60 fields installed per year when the entire US marketplace was 70-80 fields per year). Today's US market for synthetic turf is approximately 600 fields per year and 580 of those are the new long fibered in-filled turf. AstroTurf is still sold, but not really for football. It is a popular surface for field hockey, primarily on the east coast.
NFL fields are either FieldTurf (a name brand) or Sportexe. Both of these systems are much faster than the surface inside the OU practice facility, but neither is as fast as AstroTurf.
Starting that all in-filled varieties of synthetic turf is FieldTurf is like stating that all copiers are Xerox, or all facial tissues are Kleenex.
Kelley will undoubtedly run a faster 40 if he indeed runs it on AstroTurf. It would be hard to find a surface that would be much slower to run on (except muddy natural grass) than the indoor turf at OU's practice center.
I hope this helps to clear things up a little.
The Dodger;2032968 said:Okay...IF what this guy says is true...Kelly might have a legitimate gripe...
Eh...every time I hear it reported the scouts wanted him to run on that surface because it's most similar to the Combine surface. On Path to the Draft they pointed out a couple players that have fun on that field in the past and put up fast numbers.The Dodger;2032968 said:Okay...IF what this guy says is true...Kelly might have a legitimate gripe...
theogt;2033140 said:Eh...every time I hear it reported the scouts wanted him to run on that surface because it's most similar to the Combine surface. On Path to the Draft they pointed out a couple players that have fun on that field in the past and put up fast numbers.
Kelly is just slow.
DaBoys4Life;2032551 said:it's easy to talk about it and not be in the situation
Of course it's not all the same. But apparently the scouts felt it was sufficiently similar to the Combine turf that they'd prefer him to run on it. If he'd ran a 4.60 on the astroturf, they would have just adjusted his time by .1 seconds anyway.CATCH17;2033155 said:Well your wrong.
All field turf isn't the same. Until you can understand that then this discussion is useless.