Roger Goodell has the authority to overturn Detroit Lions-Dallas Cowboys' Week 17 outcome

Chuck 54

Well-Known Member
Messages
20,397
Reaction score
12,404
It has never been done, and this doesn’t even deserve to be corrected. First, there’s no proof it was a mistake. Second, if the refs announced 68 as active, the Cowboys would have covered him. Look at the way they were lined up. 68 and the 1 guy off the ball were the only eligible guys on the left side. No way that guy is open if we know he’s eligible which is what the rule is all about.
 

SexyDexy52

Active Member
Messages
130
Reaction score
179
No not until after the ball was in the air he most certainly did not!
Lawrence ran towards him after he saw Goff starting to throw and the other defender came off a WR to try to defend. Had 68 been named the eligible receiver no way he goes uncovered and gets open. Never mind the fact when 68 goes out for a pass it became an illiegal formation. Which is a penalty last time I checked….
 

bigdnlaca

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,795
Reaction score
1,350
It won’t happen because at the end of the day, the Cowboys still had time on the clock to potentially kick a fg.

If he didn’t overturn that Falcon Buc game where Jarrett sacked Brady but Boger called a roughing the passer, this will stand.
 

irishline

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,733
Reaction score
4,160
CowboysZone DIEHARD Fan
68 had two defenders on him.
Two guys running towards him after the ball is in the air is not the same as two defenders on him.

And since you are calling it rigged, what about the tripping call on the wrong team two minutes earlier? I say it was a blatant attempt to stop Dallas from running out the clock. Prove me wrong. (I don't really but it had just about the same effect).

 

rambo2

Well-Known Member
Messages
21,659
Reaction score
15,669
I mean, it was a sh¡tty way to win the game I can't lie, so it is understandable from the rest of the leagues perspective. Oh well.
What was really bad was the bogus tripping call and the holding non call at Miami and the picking up the flag in Arizona and so on.
 

bigE79

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,625
Reaction score
9,390
It's in the article, he can reschedule and restart the game or continue the game from the point of the questionable outcome.

If a commissioner-led investigation into official Brad Allen’s call reveals it was “extraordinarily unfair or outside the accepted tactics” and has “a major effect on the result of the game,” Roger Goodell can take action that includes “the reversal of a game’s result or the rescheduling of a game, either from the beginning or from the point at which the extraordinary act occurred.”
If there was ever a time for that,it should have happened in the 2014 game in greenbay..DEZ CAUGHT IT
 

Reverend Conehead

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,951
Reaction score
11,849
No happening. The comish has had the authority to overturn games for decades, but it's never happened. It would harm the sport far more than any blown call could. Plus, in this case, let's assume the refs completely screwed up the illegal touch call. Let's assume the guy reported himself eligible totally according to the rules. In that case, the Cowboys simply accept the illegal formation penalty. That penalty was certainly correct, and the refs called that one as well. So, either way, there's a 5-yard penalty against the Lions. Plus, the Cowboys would have run out the time anyway if the refs had gotten the tripping penalty correct.
...
The only way the comish could ever justify overturning the results of a game would be if something so outrageous happened that it would be a severe injustice to let the end result stand. For example, if a Super Bowl actually were fixed, and the league had absolute proof that that was the case. Let's say they figured out that a huge group of players deliberately tanked their team in the big game in order to win some huge Vegas bets, then maybe the comish gets involved by invalidating the results. Even then, I don't think they award the victory to the other team. I think they simply declare that Super Bowl [whichever number] has no champion.
 

calico

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,957
Reaction score
3,139
lol. If he hasn’t turned over the other dozens of bogus endings over the past 15 years, he’s not starting now.
 

Plankton

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,237
Reaction score
18,605
It has never been done, and this doesn’t even deserve to be corrected. First, there’s no proof it was a mistake. Second, if the refs announced 68 as active, the Cowboys would have covered him. Look at the way they were lined up. 68 and the 1 guy off the ball were the only eligible guys on the left side. No way that guy is open if we know he’s eligible which is what the rule is all about.
If the bolded were 100% true, then no tackle eligible play in history would ever work. And we know that is not true. With the Cowboys' poor attention to detail, I wouldn't rule anything out, but we'll never know.
 

Manwiththeplan

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,262
Reaction score
7,754
No its not. For the millionth time, they committed multiple penalties on that play AND it wouldn't have even happened if not for an egregious tripping call against us.

Let them all cry, as long as they do it in AT&T.
this...I'm really over the cryin lions
 
  • Like
Reactions: CWR
Top