Wayne02
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 4,348
- Reaction score
- 2,040
I am not Cebrin.
You have already replied to Cebrin.
I know who I replied to.
I am not Cebrin.
You have already replied to Cebrin.
I know. Your point?I know who I replied to.
I know. Your point?
I may be wrong, but I think he already sees the distinction.I was pointing out the way you were looking at it was okay, but the foolishness that Cebrin was talking about was just senseless. He seemed to agree with what you said so I wanted him to understand the difference.
I may be wrong, but I think he already sees the distinction.
That's not the impression I have. I believe he read where I stated this is football and inferred that "it" happens all the time, which is a reality of the game. I think that is why he hit me with a like. Then again, I could be completely wrong.I don't think he does, I think he believes that you agreed with him.
That's not the impression I have. I believe he read where I stated this is football and inferred that "it" happens all the time, which is a reality of the game. I think that is why he hit me with a like. Then again, I could be completely wrong.
You do understand that we are both nitpicking here, right? You are probably right, but how does that assertion apply to his assigning me a like? He could mean one thing and react to another thing without making the exact association between the two.But there is a difference between "it happens all of the time" and "I hope it happens to this guy because he said bad things about my favorite team." You believe the former and he believes in the latter.
You do understand that we are both nitpicking here, right? You are probably right, but how does that assertion apply to his assigning me a like? He could mean one thing and react to another thing without making the exact association between the two.
I agree, we are nitpicking, but the bottom line is, what he said about "hoping that McClain injures McCoy for the year is wrong, whether it happens or not is irrelevant, but the "hoping or wishing" that he does it is wrong. Do you agree with that?
Who cares? Players talk trash all of the time, that's no reason to stoop to the level of wishing harm on another person. Grow up man.
Did I bow out too soon? dangit.Just a couple more replies, and the argument can be won!
until it shows up in more wins then losses'All sound and fury signifying nothing'
until it shows up in more wins then losses the process and every other 'catch' phrase means nothing.
Wayne, I said, "I'm not wishing injury upon anyone" in my original post. So the already acknowledged answer is I agree. I'm giving you the final say. Do you think it is possible, not a certainty, but a possibility, that he assigned a like that does not carry the same meaning about his original comments concerning McCoy?
"I own Dallas." That's why. Let him earn his millions on the sideline. Save your judgements for you and yours.
I agree, we are nitpicking, but the bottom line is, what he said about "hoping that McClain injures McCoy for the year is wrong, whether it happens or not is irrelevant, but the "hoping or wishing" that he does it is wrong. Do you agree with that?
444 is the correct