Romo and Dak based on Raw Ability

[SteveTheCowboy]

Probably because who actually remembers any of them? How significant were they? You ask Cowboys fans what Romo's marquee game was and most say the game he looked good losing to Peyton Manning. What was Dak's? Honestly couldnt tell you. Nothing stands out.

Both were very good QB's, but both had alot of empty calories

There you go....the game Romo went toe to toe with on one the best of his day.

Romos problem that game...defense couldn't stop anything. Time running out and Romo has to gamble.

But for you well...all romos fault. Exactly what I was talking about thank you for proving my point. Assessing wins and especially lisses with zero thought...or memory.

 

[Hawkeye0202]

They seem to be treading to the same career.

Weird..........but true

 

[SteveTheCowboy]

You need to fire ChatGPT if thats where this is coming from.

Romo is more than "slightly behind" Montana. Montana won more Super Bowls than Romo won playoffs games

Montana was great. On a powerhouse team that often killed the powerhouse cowboys.

Bwtter than romo but nan....Romo hat...er critics... are something else

 

[SteveTheCowboy]

This.

What did thd cowboys win? All romos fault.

 

[Wildcat711]

Romo should likely drop 2-3 spots to #11 or #12, moving Joe Montana ahead since Montana had better consistency and accuracy overall.

Glad to hear that.. lol

Romo was fun to watch but he was no Joe Montana

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

Neither one of them could win despite the team failings. They aren't/weren't the problem, but neither are the solution either. I think Daks failings have had a lot to do with his team. That said I also believe only a couple of qbs are capable of carrying their respective teams.

I agree on all counts. And I’d probably go as far as to say I don’t think many could with this dysfunction. I don’t know if Tom or Mahomes could but I know they wouldn’t have all their rings here that they do now.

 

[America's Cowboy]

To 95% of the world Romo was known as a choker who didn’t perform at a high level when it mattered. But to Romosexuals he apparently is on the same level as Mahomes and Brady.

Correct ^^^

Proof:

 

[Catpappy]

Wish I’d never had to watch either one of them

 

[Runwildboys]

Correct ^^^

Proof:

Yeah, with Dak, you would have claimed that almost every one of those picks was the receiver's fault.

 

[Risen Star]

It's not even a comparison. Romo had much more talent than Prescott.

Romo battled with the mental side of the game to reach greatness. Prescott could have the mental side down like no other and he still wouldn't have been a franchise QB. He doesn't have the talent. There's no aspect to his game, even on his best day, that is at a high level.

 

[America's Cowboy]

Yeah, with Dak, you would have claimed that almost every one of those picks was the receiver's fault.

Not even, but if that helps you feel better, whatever you say.

 

[NewEraCowboy]

You need to fire ChatGPT if thats where this is coming from.

Romo is more than "slightly behind" Montana. Montana won more Super Bowls than Romo won playoffs games

This analysis ignores post season success. If we were ranking on post season success, this list would look a lot different.

 

[McKDaddy]

To 95% of the world Romo was known as a choker who didn’t perform at a high level when it mattered.

Perhaps that 95% should have actually watched the games rather than the media created narrative.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

Perhaps that 95% should have actually watched the games rather than the media created narrative.

I mean….i watched every game and their idea of him is on point. It’s for sure closer to choker than him being better than Montana.

 

[Runwildboys]

I mean….i watched every game and their idea of him is on point. It’s for sure closer to choker than him being better than Montana.

I know you don't let your emotions rule you here, but I think maybe you let them take over a little bit when you were watching Romo play. Yes, he made some bad decisions, but every QB does. The ones who go all the way have teammates who help negate those bad plays. Earlier in his career, he hurt the team quite a few times, but a lot of that was because he felt like he had to do too much, and he was right.

By the time he had it together, he was an injury waiting to happen. Too many sacks (some of which were his own doing, by never giving up on a play) and some were due to poor protection. His lack of playoff success was, in large part, a product of bad timing.

 

[KingCorcoran]

Tony Romo vs. Dak Prescott: A Deep Comparative Analysis Using Advanced QB Methodology


This analysis will break down Tony Romo vs. Dak Prescott using a deep, data-driven approach based on pure quarterback ability. This will ignore team success, playoff wins, and narratives and instead focus entirely on individual skill level based on five core quarterbacking metrics.

The Five QB Metrics Used for Evaluation

Each quarterback is graded on a scale of 1-10 in five key skill areas:

Arm Talent (Strength, Accuracy, Deep Ball)

• How strong is the QB’s arm? Can they effortlessly throw deep with velocity?

• How accurate are they at short, intermediate, and deep levels?

• Can they throw off-platform or into tight windows?


Decision-Making (Turnover Avoidance, Processing Speed)

• Does the QB process defenses quickly and make the right reads?

• Do they avoid bad turnovers and play efficiently?

• Can they consistently beat different coverages?



Release Time & Mechanics (Throwing Motion, Efficiency)

• Is the QB’s throwing motion quick, compact, and efficient?

• Do they have great footwork, balance, and pocket control?

Elusiveness & Pocket Movement (Escapability, Sack Avoidance)

• Can the QB extend plays and evade sacks without taking unnecessary hits?

• Do they have fluid pocket footwork and awareness?

Pre-Snap Reading & Command of Offense (Football IQ, Audibles, Play Adjustments)
• How well does the QB read defenses pre-snap and adjust at the line?

• Can they call protections, diagnose blitzes, and change plays effectively?

• Do they have a high football IQ and mastery of the system?

Romo vs. Prescott: Direct Head-to-Head Breakdown

Category	Tony Romo (2006-2016)	Dak Prescott (2016-Present)	Who Wins?
Arm Talent	9.5/10 - One of the most accurate deep passers ever, effortless release, elite velocity	7.5/10 - Above-average deep ball but inconsistent, solid arm strength but not special	Romo
Decision-Making	8.5/10 - Elite processor, quick to read defenses, but aggressive risk-taker	7.5/10 - More conservative, avoids big mistakes but hesitates on deep reads	Romo
Release & Mechanics	9.5/10 - One of the quickest releases in NFL history, perfect mechanics	7.5/10 - Good mechanics but longer release, slightly slower processing	Romo
Elusiveness & Pocket Movement	9/10 - Elite escapability, made impossible plays outside the pocket	6.5/10 - Good mobility, but gets caught holding the ball too long	Romo
Pre-Snap Reading & Command of Offense	9.5/10 - One of the smartest QBs ever pre-snap, called his own protections, read defenses like Manning	7.5/10 - Above-average pre-snap but relies on coaches for adjustments	Romo

Final Skill Comparison Scores

Category	Tony Romo	Dak Prescott	Who Wins?
Arm Talent	9.5	7.5	Romo (+2.0)
Decision-Making	8.5	7.5	Romo (+1.0)
Release & Mechanics	9.5	7.5	Romo (+2.0)
Elusiveness & Pocket Movement	9.0	6.5	Romo (+2.5)
Pre-Snap IQ & Command of Offense	9.5	7.5	Romo (+2.0)

Total Score:


• Tony Romo → 46.0/50


• Dak Prescott → 36.5/50


Winner: Tony Romo (+9.5 points over Dak)


Deep-Dive Analysis of Their Strengths & Weaknesses


Why Tony Romo Was a More Skilled QB


Superior Throwing Mechanics & Release


• Romo had a top-3 fastest release in NFL history, similar to Marino and Rodgers.

• His footwork was elite, allowing him to throw accurately under pressure.

Better Deep Ball Accuracy

• Romo’s deep ball placement was near perfect. His connection with Dez Bryant and Miles Austin showcased pinpoint accuracy on vertical routes.

• Dak is inconsistent throwing deep, often under-throwing receivers.

Elite Playmaker Under Pressure

• Romo could escape pressure and still make perfect throws. He was Aaron Rodgers before Aaron Rodgers.

• Dak panics more under pressure, leading to more sacks or short, safe throws.

Smarter Pre-Snap Adjustments

• Romo called his own protections and adjusted routes, similar to Peyton Manning.

• Dak relies heavily on offensive coordinators for adjustments.



Where Dak Prescott Has the Edge

Less Risk-Taking

• Dak protects the ball better, throwing fewer risky passes than Romo.

• Romo’s aggressiveness led to more jaw-dropping plays but also occasional bad interceptions.


Better Designed Offense to Minimize Mistakes

• Dak benefits from modern RPO schemes that simplify his reads.

• Romo played in a more complex offense where he had more responsibility.


Stronger & More Durable Physically

• Dak is bigger and takes more hits without breaking down.

• Romo suffered multiple injuries due to his reckless playstyle and lack of protection.



Final Verdict: Why Romo Was the Better QB


Tony Romo is the more complete and talented quarterback in every category except risk management and durability.


If Romo played in today’s offense with modern rules, he would put up Mahomes-like efficiency numbers.


Who Would You Rather Have in a Game?

• If you need a quarterback who can execute a structured system without mistakes → Dak Prescott.

• If you need a quarterback who can improvise, make elite throws, and elevate an offense beyond the system → Tony Romo, by a wide margin.



Conclusion: Romo Was an Elite-Level QB, Dak Is a Good QB

• Tony Romo was a Top-10 all-time talent in raw ability.

• Dak Prescott is a Top-35-40 level talent who benefits from modern rules and schemes.


• If Romo played in today’s NFL, his numbers would be even better than what we saw in his career.


Final Thought: Dak is a very good quarterback, but Romo was an elite quarterback who never got the recognition he deserved.

This is nonsense.

 

[CowboysFaninHouston]

There you go....the game Romo went toe to toe with on one the best of his day.

Romos problem that game...defense couldn't stop anything. Time running out and Romo has to gamble.

But for you well...all romos fault. Exactly what I was talking about thank you for proving my point. Assessing wins and especially lisses with zero thought...or memory.

Can I call you a Romo lover?

 

[McKDaddy]

I mean….i watched every game and their idea of him is on point. It’s for sure closer to choker than him being better than Montana.

How do you define choker?

Doesn't the facts about all his comeback victories, QB rating late in games, etc., all run contrary to choker?

I mean every QB makes mistakes but not all of them are chokers.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

I know you don't let your emotions rule you here, but I think maybe you let them take over a little bit when you were watching Romo play. Yes, he made some bad decisions, but every QB does. The ones who go all the way have teammates who help negate those bad plays. Earlier in his career, he hurt the team quite a few times, but a lot of that was because he felt like he had to do too much, and he was right.

By the time he had it together, he was an injury waiting to happen. Too many sacks (some of which were his own doing, by never giving up on a play) and some were due to poor protection. His lack of playoff success was, in large part, a product of bad timing.

I mean there’s always an excuse for why someone isn’t performing well. Dak can say the same thing. I use to be a Romosexuak. And even to this day I’ll defend him to an extent. I don’t think he was a bad QB and I think he wouldve had more success if he played somewhere else lol. But he didn’t. He played in Dallas. And so I have to gauge him like I would anyone else. He just didn’t perform at a high level when it mattered. Doesn’t mean he’s bad. But I couldn’t rely on him to give me a 5 touchdown game in a playoff game. I need a few those when the defense is sucking.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

How do you define choker?

Doesn't the facts about all his comeback victories, QB rating late in games, etc., all run contrary to choker?

I mean every QB makes mistakes but not all of them are chokers.

It’s not the mistakes per se. It’s more so when two juggernauts show up who do I get? When a win or you in game happens am I getting a great game? Or just ok? Good enough? Good enough just ain’t good enough in Dallas. Romo would’ve been good enough in San Diego or Cleveland. In Dallas it just wasn’t enough. 200 yards and 1 Td in a big game just isn’t it.