Romo by the numbers...

DIAF

DivaLover159
Messages
4,768
Reaction score
874
SultanOfSix;1160176 said:
It's just been three games. He's played remarkably well in those three games for someone who is getting his first live meaningful NFL action. No one knows the future, but his play has been consistent enough to make me believe he can be the future.



It's amazing how people can rationalize different things depending upon their own perceived biases. Three interceptions alone are bad IF THEY'RE ALL THE FAULT OF THE QB. But, the game isn't executed in a vacuum, and I am exercising my judgement based off other factors to make the conclusion that those three interceptions aren't all the fault of Romo, which seemingly you did ("got killed").


If that's the case, then we can rationalize away half of Vinny and QC's ints. Or Bledsoes. But no one ever does that. Wonder why. Either you perform and make plays or you don't. Make all the excuses you want, but he threw those three INTs. No one else did. No one blames the OL when bledsoe throws a pick under durress, so why make similar excuses for Romo. Anyways, yeah, he's played well so far, but I'm reserving judgement for that murderous stretch we've got coming up. If he tanks in the face of those teams, I think we should be drafting a backup and then seeing what happens the season after that with Romo as a full-time starter.
 
Top