WPBCowboysFan;5046580 said:So many people get really irked by Romo always seeming to let the play clock run down to a second or two before getting the ball snapped.
What does this accomplish in his favor?
Does it really give the defense an edge because they know that now the snap is coming?
Is it more on Romo or Red J?
5Stars;5046903 said:And Madden, huh?
:laugh2:
The defense still does not know where the ball is going or what play is called, run or pass.
speedkilz88;5046947 said:That had everything to do with Ryan Cook not adjusting well to Romo's cadence. The other OL had a tough time knowing when he was going to get the snap off.
jzcowboy;5046634 said:They don't know it's coming, they can't be looking at the playclock, they are looking at their man waiting for the snap.
Proximo;5046902 said:Oh, ok. So you don't have any actual data then? You just watch "a ton of games". Cool.
I guess that puts you in a position to state such things as being fact even though you have no actual figures to review or analyze.
davidyee;5047147 said:...on any given play there is more than one player who can see the play clock.
Often the wide lbs can see the clock along with the safeties.
The defence knows when the clock has run down. This is why you will often see the defence point at the QB to indicate and help the reference call a time count violation.
WPBCowboysFan;5046989 said:One does not need to "record actual data" to have a legitimate opinion on a topic.
When speaking in a general sense, statements can be made that are valid even with the absence of "recorded actual data."
Denim Chicken;5046654 said:This is a fallacy, anyhow. While there are many times he allows the play clock to run down, there are many times he does not.
CyberB0b;5047218 said:I think a lot of it is Garrett's fault. It seems like he is really late calling the play in. Maybe there is some truth to him being overwhelmed by coaching and playcalling.
Hoofbite;5047222 said:People have been complaining about this longer than Garrett has been the head coach.
Hoofbite;5046949 said:I just watched the condensed version of the Bengals vs. Broncos game and looked at the time left on the play clock for almost every snap the Broncos took. Couldn't see a couple plays that happened after an onside kick with like 0:50 seconds left in the game.
Anyway, the Broncos rarely went under 5 seconds. I counted 6 plays where they were snapping the ball with 5 seconds or less. 2 of these came on a drive late in the 4th quarter when they had the lead and were driving.
I counted 19 plays where they snapped the ball with more than 15 seconds on the play clock.
I counted at least 4 plays that had 20 seconds on the play clock. I say "at least" because a couple of the plays they actually snapped it before the play clock was on the screen and after the snap you could see 18 or 19 show up.
Interestingly, CBS seems to put the play clock up for every play. Or at least it seems that way. Seems like Fox only does so when it's down to single digits sometimes.
In total, they averaged over 12 seconds on the play clock at the time of the snap.
davidyee;5047144 said:...watch the ball, dbs watch their man, lbs and safeties can peek at the clock to time blitzes.
bingo. there isn't a qb in the league that does it more than romo.ufcrules1;5047304 said:Thank you for validating my claim. Sadly we have some young kids here who think that you have to pull out actual "factual" statistics to prove your point on anything. I have watched Petyton extensively his whole career, same with Brady, Brees, Rodgers, Romo, etc. Romo waits until the last minute a LOT before hiking the ball, with the other QB's mentioned it is completely random when they hike. They rarely have to wait until the last minute to find out what scheme the defense is going to use, I would guess that most of the time they feel like they are just going to execute anyway.
Some fans here only watch the Cowboys games and don't watch other QB's unless those other QB's are playing against the Cowboys or go off of what they see on ESPN. These particular fans want you to pull up some insane statistics that are impossible to find to validate what your opinion.
Proximo;5047188 said:Do you know the difference between a fact and an opinion?
ufcrules1;5047304 said:...Sadly we have some young kids here who think that you have to pull out actual "factual" statistics to prove your point on anything. I have watched Petyton extensively his whole career, same with Brady, Brees, Rodgers, Romo, etc. Romo waits until the last minute a LOT before hiking the ball, with the other QB's mentioned it is completely random when they hike. They rarely have to wait until the last minute to find out what scheme the defense is going to use, I would guess that most of the time they feel like they are just going to execute anyway.
Idgit;5047330 said:The 'young kids' are right. Without factual support, what you've got is an opinion. And you can't prove an opinion; all you can do is hold it.
And that's fine if you want to hold opinions that you haven't supported with evidence. We all do that to some extent or another. Just don't trick yourself into thinking something is so, just because you choose to believe it. And maybe don't be so quick to discard a request that you backup your opinion with evidence if you expect it to be debated seriously.