Wow. It's like you're a broken record. I tell you it's a team game, where coaching and talent at all the other positions matter, this applies to the Pats and the Cowboys, and you just keep saying it's all Brady for the SBs and it's all Romo's fault for the lack of SBs. Out of the ten years that Romo has been the starting QB for the Cowboys, how many of those years do you think independent football analysts legitimately thought the Cowboys had a chance at winning the SB? I think only two were possibilities: the 13-3 team from 2006 and the 12-4 team from two years ago. And even in the latter, most thought the defense wasn't a good enough SB defense. That's it. Whereas the Pats have been considered SB contenders almost every year for the past 15 years.