DandyDon52
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 23,048
- Reaction score
- 16,873
just imo, but what is left out here in both cases, is the lack of a good HC during Romo's good years, and dak's good years.Who is trashing Romo? Is it considered trashing if we acknowledge some of Romo's limitations? Romo had some pretty good teams and he lost in the playoffs just like Dak. Why is it okay to criticize Dak for failing to win but not Romo?
Romo was a good QB. He had some real talent at the position. But he had his limitations too, some of the same limitations as Dak. He also got a huge contract, for his time, just before his body started to fail him.
I dont blame Romo or Dak for not winning more in playoffs, due to they worked with poor HC's and staff's, and at times
did not have a good run game, and Romo never had a good defense, and dak didnt until Quinn and parsons got here.
QB's dont draft, run FA,build good defense's make game plans, or call plays. Yet they get the blame for losing, and credit for winning.
If you look at Eli, coughlin was a good HC, he had a good OC and DC, nyg had a good defense, and a great one in the 2 SB years.
But eli gets credit for winning 2 SB's, when really it was a "TEAM" WIN. Eli did play good in the playoffs. in those 2 SB years. but
he had the defense and the right coaches.
Both Romo and dak have never had that, but dak did have the defense for 2 years, 22 and 23, but coaching and culture, and jerry all threw a wrench
in the wheel.
Both romo and dak get a bad rep, for things they couldnt control.
EVen mahomes would have had a hard time winning a SB here with cowboys.