Romo's final 5 games last season

Doomsday101;1509172 said:
He admitted he was drinking when he wrote it. :laugh2:


Even when I am drinking, I am not that stupid.

Sure, I got drunk and punched the outside of my apartment this year, fracturing a bone in my hand....

But never that stupid......to suggest Romo did it on purpose.
 
Doomsday101;1509172 said:
He admitted he was drinking when he wrote it. :laugh2:
That's always a fallback when something you truly believe in gets bashed.
 
WoodysGirl;1509177 said:
That's always a fallback when something you truly believe in gets bashed.

I'll need to remember that and put that in my excuse book. I was drunk at the time. :laugh2:
 
- I was drunk

- I was multi-tasking

- I was distracted by _____ (dog, kids, woman, man, friend, boss)

- My _____ (dog, kids, woman, man, friend, boss) logged on with my screen name

- I was posting several boards at one time

- Too many windows opened, got confused where I was at
 
To clarify:

a.) I thought what I thought during the game and have not changed my position. I am not backpeddling one bit. Sure, I could be wrong, but it was my first instinct which usually serves me well. Bottom line (as I already said -- best case scenario -- total lack of concentration). And I bet he won't have that job (kick holder) this year.

b.) The vodka gave me the "looseness" to pose the question on this board. And for that I did apologize. I was basically looking to see if anyone else thought the same -- guess not.

c.) As I have stated, I am not the only person that thought the same thing. Obviously, not from folks on this board.

OK, you had your fun. I got some action (juices going) during the off-season. Football will be here soon enough.

One more thing though, as I was writing I started thinking about QB's like Marino, and Peyton (before he changed). Unless you have a really good defense -- real good -- then your QB is the most important guy on the field during the playoffs and SB. A cool head, a smart QB. Not just a guy that can throw the ball. I don't want to start a thread within a thread but Marino comes to mind. He was the team, yet he had lots of talent around him. Never won the Bowl. Should have. Makes you think.

OK, really off.
 
Pats Fan;1509159 said:
Guess I have to respond. First off, I did not say Romo is a bad QB. In fact, I said he was 10x better than Bledsoe. So on that we can agree. I do think he has "hot shot" issues and needs to play more on a team basis and think rather than do. I will stand by that. Because of that, I am not sure after one year he is your guy. I cannot say yes, I cannot say no. I really think the jury is still out. This year will answer the question.

It was his first year starting. Of course the jury's still out. You're not breaking any new ground there, Copernicus.

My opinion is that you're just jealous. For years now it's been Manning and Brady, Brady and Manning. Oh sure, Carson Palmer rose up for a second, but he's not nearly so charismatic as those two. But here in Tony Romo, you have a QB that inspired his team to greater heights, he's charismatic, good-looking, the media loves him, and suddenly the Cowboys are back in the spotlight. Their QB is the talk of the town. Brady's got three rings, but all anyone can talk about him now is that he's knocking up models and spreading his illegitimate seed throughout hollywood.

Nope, the big news is Tony Romo and the Dallas Cowboys, an up and coming team - and most of the rest of the league is up in arms with downplaying Romo and the rest of the team Parcells put together. "We were better than them last year - but people like them, and they get the coverage!" It's true. We just matter more.

Of course, none of this might be true, and you might be perfectly happy with your paper tiger of a team. I don't have any basis for my claims, but I'm going to doggedly stick to it no matter how ridiculous I sound.
 
superpunk;1509356 said:
It was his first year starting. Of course the jury's still out. You're not breaking any new ground there, Copernicus.

My opinion is that you're just jealous. For years now it's been Manning and Brady, Brady and Manning. Oh sure, Carson Palmer rose up for a second, but he's not nearly so charismatic as those two. But here in Tony Romo, you have a QB that inspired his team to greater heights, he's charismatic, good-looking, the media loves him, and suddenly the Cowboys are back in the spotlight. Their QB is the talk of the town. Brady's got three rings, but all anyone can talk about him now is that he's knocking up models and spreading his illegitimate seed throughout hollywood.

Nope, the big news is Tony Romo and the Dallas Cowboys, an up and coming team - and most of the rest of the league is up in arms with downplaying Romo and the rest of the team Parcells put together. "We were better than them last year - but people like them, and they get the coverage!" It's true. We just matter more.

Of course, none of this might be true, and you might be perfectly happy with your paper tiger of a team. I don't have any basis for my claims, but I'm going to doggedly stick to it no matter how ridiculous I sound.

I promise I will go away soon, but SuperPunk you are one funny guy. No hidden agenda, I mean it. Good poster as well. But man, you are a homer bud!!! Which is A-OK, I am too -- of course for that paper tiger team and seed planting Brady!
 
Pats Fan;1509337 said:
And I bet he won't have that job (kick holder) this year.

Man, you really are going on a limb with this one, especially after WP announced that Romo will not be the kick holder couple of months ago.
 
Pats Fan;1509424 said:
I promise I will go away soon, but SuperPunk you are one funny guy. No hidden agenda, I mean it. Good poster as well. But man, you are a homer bud!!! Which is A-OK, I am too -- of course for that paper tiger team and seed planting Brady!

FYI, we are taking both of the Patriots first rounders next year. :toast:
 
Folks, drunk is never an excuse. You are either stupid or you aren't. Only losers blame the alcohol.
 
Boyzmamacita;1508288 said:
Our strategy in the Seattle game (or lack thereof) is one that will baffle us for ages to come.

It wasn't "our" strategy - it was the Hall of Famer Coach Parcells strategy.
 
abersonc;1509435 said:
Folks, drunk is never an excuse. You are either stupid or you aren't. Only losers blame the alcohol.
Having a couple margaritas at lunch never affects the quality of my work.
 
Sarge;1509522 said:
It wasn't "our" strategy - it was the Hall of Famer Coach Parcells strategy.

Parcells isn't a hall of famer.

But the way he dominates the postings of those who couldn't wait to see him gone certainly makes him seem like one.

It's a tad ironic. People who couldn't wait to see him gone, now can't stop talking about him. Oh well - gotta get that post count up somehow.
 
superpunk;1509546 said:
Parcells isn't a hall of famer.

But the way he dominates the postings of those who couldn't wait to see him gone certainly makes him seem like one.

It's a tad ironic. People who couldn't wait to see him gone, now can't stop talking about him. Oh well - gotta get that post count up somehow.
:muttley:
 
superpunk;1509546 said:
Parcells isn't a hall of famer.

But the way he dominates the postings of those who couldn't wait to see him gone certainly makes him seem like one.

It's a tad ironic. People who couldn't wait to see him gone, now can't stop talking about him. Oh well - gotta get that post count up somehow.

............................:jerk:
 
abersonc;1509435 said:
Folks, drunk is never an excuse. You are either stupid or you aren't. Only losers blame the alcohol.

What about huffing paint thinner? Is that a good excuse?
 
fortdick;1509931 said:
What about huffing paint thinner? Is that a good excuse?

I now understand your logic soooooo much better
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
464,054
Messages
13,786,169
Members
23,771
Latest member
LandryHat
Back
Top