Rosenthal's midseason QB rankings - Dak nearly top 10

JJHLH1

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,312
Reaction score
14,627
It looks like it's Dak's team now. He's earned the right to remain the starter as long as he continues to play well.
 

MichaelWinicki

"You want some?"
Staff member
Messages
47,997
Reaction score
27,917
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
I hope Garrett/Jerry have the guts to make the tough decision which is Romo starting, with all the media and most fans saying this is Dak´s job it won´t be easy to make the change but the film should tell them that Romo takes this team to Championship level not Dak, at least not now.
Not bashing Dak in any kind of way, I love the guy but Romo is simply the better QB (2014 version) at this point.

The challenge for me Coy, and I'm not saying Romo shouldn't start, is that the Romo we know hasn't played at a high level in 2 years. And 2 years is a long time in the NFL. The film of 2014 isn't applicable... And quite frankly even the first couple games of last season prior to the first injury he didn't look all that sharp.

What they (the Cowboys brain trust) is look at how he's moving and throwing in practice and if they think he's a better option than Prescott then by all means put him in. But if he ain't... then he ain't. Prescott's playing at a high level. Romo needs to exceed that.
 

65fastback2plus2

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,788
Reaction score
6,652
The challenge for me Coy, and I'm not saying Romo shouldn't start, is that the Romo we know hasn't played at a high level in 2 years. And 2 years is a long time in the NFL. The film of 2014 isn't applicable... And quite frankly even the first couple games of last season prior to the first injury he didn't look all that sharp.

What they (the Cowboys brain trust) is look at how he's moving and throwing in practice and if they think he's a better option than Prescott then by all means put him in. But if he ain't... then he ain't. Prescott's playing at a high level. Romo needs to exceed that.

He looked HOT in the preseason game before he got injured...so we can assume he still haz it. If not, he would suck it up in practice drills too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Coy

visionary

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,449
Reaction score
33,411
11) Dak Prescott, Dallas Cowboys (Preseason: 27)

Prescott's ability to finish with a flourish against Philadelphia helped erase what was otherwise his toughest career start. That ability to fight through adversity has impressed coach Jason Garrett and owner Jerry Jones, who all but confirmed the Dallas quarterback decision is made. They are going to keep playing Prescott until he compels them to do otherwise.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap30...ex-derek-carr-ascending-in-midseason-rankings

This is obviously a flawed evaluation since it had Wentz at 16
 

Coy

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,412
Reaction score
2,539
The challenge for me Coy, and I'm not saying Romo shouldn't start, is that the Romo we know hasn't played at a high level in 2 years. And 2 years is a long time in the NFL. The film of 2014 isn't applicable... And quite frankly even the first couple games of last season prior to the first injury he didn't look all that sharp.

What they (the Cowboys brain trust) is look at how he's moving and throwing in practice and if they think he's a better option than Prescott then by all means put him in. But if he ain't... then he ain't. Prescott's playing at a high level. Romo needs to exceed that.

Great point, and I agree but you at least have to give him a chance to prove it to you, don´t you think? Hey, we won on Sunday but that wasn´t a good game for Dak, saying that I do know it´s a tough decision because we are winning and frankly Dak has the "it" factor whatever that means and is playing winning football. I just hope they go with their gut, whatever that is, and not fall for the pressure of everybody saying that Dak cannot be benched.
Anyway, I am thrilled that we have our QB for the next decade.
 

bsbellomy

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,437
Reaction score
3,193
I don't think you would find a top 10 QB reading from anyone that wouldn't have Romo in the top ten qb's
 
  • Like
Reactions: Coy

MichaelWinicki

"You want some?"
Staff member
Messages
47,997
Reaction score
27,917
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Great point, and I agree but you at least have to give him a chance to prove it to you, don´t you think? Hey, we won on Sunday but that wasn´t a good game for Dak, saying that I do know it´s a tough decision because we are winning and frankly Dak has the "it" factor whatever that means and is playing winning football. I just hope they go with their gut, whatever that is, and not fall for the pressure of everybody saying that Dak cannot be benched.
Anyway, I am thrilled that we have our QB for the next decade.

You give him a chance to prove it in practice.
 

65fastback2plus2

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,788
Reaction score
6,652
I shake my head at comments like that.

He was 1 for 1 for 11 yards in the preseason game vs. Seattle.

Obviously you replied based on agenda and not fact.

I shake my head at comments that reply and dont read....the preseason game BEFORE he got injured...dallas versus miami. 4/5 for 49
 

Bullflop

Cowboys Diehard
Messages
25,729
Reaction score
30,915
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Now that we have established the fact that we've got two, (count 'em, 2) good QBs, let us give thanks. THANK YOU, SWEET JESUS!!

Now, then, one will be playing Sunday and the other will be getting back to his conditioning procedure and hoping to be activated very soon, as Jerry has recently declared. Does that mean that he will be replacing Dak as a starter anytime soon? Nobody knows for sure -- I suspect there's a chance that not even Jerry does at this point in time. Still, we are blessed, nevertheless, despite the controversy. Let's not forget that . . . ;)
 
Last edited:

JoeyBoy718

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,715
Reaction score
12,709
16) Carson Wentz, Philadelphia Eagles (Preseason: 29)



url

Blasphemy.
 

65fastback2plus2

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,788
Reaction score
6,652
The writer didn't say anything about repeatability. You added that on your own.

This was a first half ranking, period.

So he considered they were all rookies then...got it.

He doesnt have to mention every single thing he takes into account to do so.

"Lets rank an unproven rookie over a superbowl winning QB because of a couple weeks of stats" lol not.
 
Top