Roy should decline the invite

did Ed Reed and his 4 picks , 1 forced fumble and only 8 passes defensed deserve to go? And thats despite playing on a team with a superior pass rush

did John Lynch and his zero plays made deserve to go?

I'm sure most will agree on Lynch, but alot of the pinheads will all say Reed deserves to go, even though he hasnt been anywhere near as productive as RW

David
 
tnewman41;1248056 said:
what ever man Roy deserves to be there. he only got beat cuz hes trying to play both saftey positons at the same time cuz we dont have a good free safety right now

This is perhaps the dumbest post I've ever read.
 
If you're gonna defend Roy, then don't moan about Hall's selection. Both guys have picks and give up big plays.
 
dbair1967;1248094 said:
did Ed Reed and his 4 picks , 1 forced fumble and only 8 passes defensed deserve to go? And thats despite playing on a team with a superior pass rush

did John Lynch and his zero plays made deserve to go?

I'm sure most will agree on Lynch, but alot of the pinheads will all say Reed deserves to go, even though he hasnt been anywhere near as productive as RW

David

BUT I saw Ed Reed score a TD on ESPN.

That MUST mean something.

Remember... he stripped his own teammate... was amaaaazing.










;)
 
smarta5150;1248090 said:
But then I noticed who started this thread.

A. A person who does not know what a Strong Safety does in the NFL.
B. a Joke
C. all of the above.
 
bbgun;1248097 said:
If you're gonna defend Roy, then don't moan about Hall's selection. Both guys have picks and give up big plays.

at least 2 of Hall's 4 picks came on balls deflected by other players

and Hall has given up WAY more big plays and tds than RW has

David
 
BlueDemon;1247934 said:
I mean how can he really feel he deserved it? how can he wear a Pro Bowl jersey when all those dudes have seen him get beat deep week after week?
He should give his slot to Jason Ferguson who was flat out robbed.
Do the right thing Roy.

:rolleyes:

Exhibit A of the watering down of the quality of the posters on this board. Who let you on here? Can't you guys start killing yourselves off, "Darwin award" style? It sure would save me a lot of wasted hours spent reading drivel like this.
 
bbgun;1248097 said:
If you're gonna defend Roy, then don't moan about Hall's selection. Both guys have picks and give up big plays.

Do you even watch football games?

Hall has been beat terribly against:

Dallas
Pittsburg
New Orleans

And these are ONLY games off the top of my head in which he gave up at LEAST 2 TDs.

Watch some games.
 
smarta5150;1248105 said:
Do you even watch football games?

Hall has been beat terribly against:

Dallas
Pittsburg
New Orleans

And these are ONLY games off the top of my head in which he gave up at LEAST 2 TDs.

Watch some games.
I don't think Roy would ever get outrun by Hines Ward wearing only one shoe.
 
zrinkill;1248109 said:
He sees them through burgundy tinted glasses .... as a Commander fan.


He definitely thinks like one.

EDIT: Probbaly thinks Sean Taylor deserves a PB appearance.
 
dbair1967;1248100 said:
at least 2 of Hall's 4 picks came on balls deflected by other players

You still have to adjust and make the play.

and Hall has given up WAY more big plays and tds than RW has

Well I should think so. After all, Hall's matched up against WRs exclusively. Roy gets TEs and backs to cover.
 
bbgun;1248125 said:
Well I should think so. After all, Hall's matched up against WRs exclusively. Roy gets TEs and backs to cover.

Hall is suppose to be able to cover WRs.

If RWs was he would be a CB.

He is a STRONG safety.

How many STRONG safteties in the league are asked to do everything RW is being asked to do?

Once we find a FS answer NO one will argue this again.
 
smarta5150;1248105 said:
Do you even watch football games?

Hall has been beat terribly against:

Dallas
Pittsburg
New Orleans

And these are ONLY games off the top of my head in which he gave up at LEAST 2 TDs.

Watch some games.

Um, I do. I fully concur that Hall is not Pro Bowl worthy. The point is that Roy has the same flaws in his game, and consistency demands that he be skipped over too. He's only going because the alternatives at his position are worse. That's hardly a ringing endorsement. Get it, Gomer?
 
bbgun;1248135 said:
Um, I do. I fully concur that Hall is not Pro Bowl worthy. The point is that Roy has the same flaws in his game, and consistency demands that he be skipped over too. He's only going because the alternatives at his position are worse. That's hardly a ringing endorsement. Get it, Gomer?

Ask anyone that knows anything about the game and they will tell you differently.

Just because Sean Taylor isnt half the player RW is dont get pissy about RW making the PB.

He deserves to be involved. 99% of the teams in the NFL would take RW in a heart beat.
 
smarta5150;1248129 said:
Hall is suppose to be able to cover WRs.

If RWs was he would be a CB.

He is a STRONG safety.

How many STRONG safteties in the league are asked to do everything RW is being asked to do?

Once we find a FS answer NO one will argue this again.

Yes, that's strong safety, not strong linebacker. Believe it or not, even strong safeties are supposed to cover receivers. Especially when they went 8th in the draft, are pulling down millions, and frequently have a 15-yard head start on every passing play. Take the blinders off.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
464,992
Messages
13,841,602
Members
23,783
Latest member
Dstar69
Back
Top