Honestly, I think he still retires here, or at least finishes out his contract. He may not be an every down player, but he will have a role on this team.dwight;2276662 said:Did anybody notice that Dallas defense played well without Roy Williams. I don't see Dallas keeping him next year.
Hostile;2276674 said:Yeah, his absence is why we played well.
I am just stating my feelings about the topic. Is that a problem?dwight;2276691 said:I am just stating my feelings about the defense. Is that a problem?
Hostile;2276709 said:I am just stating my feelings about the topic. Is that a problem?
dwight;2276723 said:I asked you first. You answer my question. Then I will answer yours. Is that a problem?
T.O81;2276687 said:Not another lets trash RW thread please, stop the nonsense!!
I did answer yours, re-read the first sentence. I told you exactly what I was doing.dwight;2276723 said:I asked you first. You answer my question. Then I will answer yours. Is that a problem?
starchamber;2276730 said:Honestly, the dude is a liability. And unless he changes his number to 58 (meaning they convert him to LB...) I don't see how they can justify his presence on the team considering the money thet are paying him....:starspin
Hostile;2276750 said:I did answer yours, re-read the first sentence. I told you exactly what I was doing.
Bob Sacamano;2276762 said:I don't even think death will keep people from not talking about Roy Williams
we just won!
Every game we win without him must mean we can't win with him. That is the message of the thread I suppose.Bob Sacamano;2276762 said:I don't even think death will keep people from not talking about Roy Williams
we just won!