Clove;1135553 said:
I too have to give props to Taylor, and I don't think he's slightly better in coverage, I think they are equal. So if all things are equal, then give the edge to the stand up character guy, that's Roy Williams.
Taylor is a good player no doubt. I don't really think he's better in coverage either. He was used more in coverage in college I believe and I remember his INTs being a big selling point at draft time.
I truly think Roy is a slightly better player, seems a more mature player. And I don't just mean that he's not a thug, I mean he seems more adept, more prepared, and more prone to make a big play.....not a lot better, but a little.
If Taylor matures a bit, maybe he'll be better than Roy I don't know. I don't think he's there yet though. Talented though definitely.
What's funny though in a way is that we all expect Roy to be bulletproof/flawless each and every game and we expect him to make big plays every game. It just so happens that he gets beaten once in a while. Steeler fans expect the same from Palmolive, skins fans expect the same from Taylor...etc...
The fact is that everyone in the NFL is pretty darned good and every player, even all-stars, are going to get beaten some times. Many times we just have unrealistic expectations of players, esp on defense where its so reactive.
Even Deion got beaten once in a while....it was just fewer and farther between than most. And the rules have been changed since he played.