GalvestonCowboyFan
Member
- Messages
- 147
- Reaction score
- 0
I was discussing this with a Cardinal-fan friend of mine today, and an interesting question came up... Even though there's lots of talk about "needing" complementary players (for example, since we're discussing receivers: the big, tall, bruiser WR and the nimble, speedy type to stretch the field), wouldn't it make just as much sense to try to overload on a certain type of player? AZ has two players in Fitz and Boldin who are not world-class sprinters but have great hands and can both catch the ball in traffic and run with it when they get it. This might actually be tougher to cover than the prototypical "complementary" scheme, because you would need at least two big, strong, physical CBs to cover them both. It is less likely that a team, our theory goes, would have two superstrong CBs, so there should always be a mismatch. If, however, you have that one "stretch-the-field" guy and the one big bully, a defense can work to cover the big guy with a big corner, and the field-stretcher with their fastest (but not necessarily biggest) CB. To a certain extent, we already have that with Witten, but, since he is still a TE, it is a little less of a headache for the defense.
All this to say that, whatever the cost, it would be sweeet to see TO and Boldin on the field at the same time, and, while it might cost a lot, it'd be worth an awful lot too.
All this to say that, whatever the cost, it would be sweeet to see TO and Boldin on the field at the same time, and, while it might cost a lot, it'd be worth an awful lot too.