@Knotamus I'd rather keep my 3rd and 4th round picks than trade for Kirk. WR class is deep. Also, I'd rather have a KJ Hill in the 3rd or 4th (or a player like that) for the next 4 years vs Kirk on a two year deal.
I’m with you all the way. I only suggested a 4th as example, because Kirk’s talent and experience may warrant that. Obviously, I’d feel better with a 5th or 6th.
I don’t think thats too far of stretch.. I mean we landed Austin, a former 1st Rd talent, for a 6th. And as mention by
@CalPolyTechnique, the WR market is weirdly subjective. Just look at the trades of “big names” Wr over the last few years.
Look, the trade would have to make sense for both teams. Arizona has Fitz, Hopkins, and Last years rookie, Isabella. They way Arz sees it, they can trade Kirk and use the pick for a WR this year, like I suppose we could. They have the luxury at the moment of having three, maybe four, capable WRs and have the time to wait for another rookie to develop... Dallas doesn’t. Not to mention, Kirk will want to get paid in a couple of years. Sure Dallas could easily draft one themselves, but if your hoping he’ll start right away.. well, we better be picking one near the top of our draft. That said, I’d rather go Defense, Defense, Defense with our top three draft picks. Too many holes on that side of the ball to use a 1-3 pick on a Wr imo.
I should mention, I’d rather draft one this year myself, but if we can land a proven starter that also can return punts for a deal.. Well then, why not. That covers two needs without the “hope” a rookie Wr will do the same.
Again, I’m not suggesting we make this trade by all cost, but if it’s reasonable.. I make the move all day.
Of course this thread is all speculation anyway
(Side note: A trade for a player wont mess with any comp picks for next year either, which also could be a motivating factor for Dallas)