TheRomoSexual
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 4,057
- Reaction score
- 4,958
Why would Buffalo let him go?
I'm not saying they would. There was just a tweet indicating that we had interest.
Why would Buffalo let him go?
Other names to watch would be, in our estimation, Lions running back Mikel Leshoure, Saints running back Mark Ingram, and Raiders running backDarren McFadden. Leshoure and Ingram have gotten buried on their respective depth charts; McFadden is in the final year of his rookie deal.
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/10/20/report-cowboys-could-trade-for-a-running-back/
Other names to watch would be, in our estimation, Lions running back Mikel Leshoure, Saints running back Mark Ingram, and Raiders running backDarren McFadden. Leshoure and Ingram have gotten buried on their respective depth charts; McFadden is in the final year of his rookie deal.
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/10/20/report-cowboys-could-trade-for-a-running-back/
I'm not saying they would. There was just a tweet indicating that we had interest.
McFadden would make Murray look durable.
They said there is "internal discussion" on Murray possibly not being the return starter next year and looking at possibilities for what to do.
If true I am glad the organization is looking at getting better there and not resting on it's laurels.
He makes like 9 million dollars. There is no way to have him and I think the same is true of spiller who makes too much.
Yeah. Bob Sturm weighed in on this too. He's not a fan of Rappoport's at all.
Implied he wasn't much of a reporter.
They said there is "internal discussion" on Murray possibly not being the return starter next year and looking at possibilities for what to do.
If true I am glad the organization is looking at getting better there and not resting on it's laurels.
@Michael_Fabiano: Per @RapSheet, Cowboys no longer sold on DeMarco Murray as their franchise RB. Watch them at the trade deadline. -> CJ Spiller, maybe?
I would have no interest in McFadden he's a good back when healthy but he's missed more games than he's played due to repeated injuries. He only started 12 games his first 2 seasons due to injuries. His healthiest year was in 2010 when he only missed 3 games. In 2011 he missed 9 games due to an injury. In 2012 he missed 4 games with yet another injury. in his last 3 seasons he's rushed for less than 1600 yards. He's already missed one game this season with an injury.
Randle has only been a Cowboy for 6 months. He is still pretty green.I think this is a lot more of an indictment of Randle, Dunbar and Tanner than it is Murray.
Fwiw mike fisher said he was told by the highest source this is complete horse crap.
most of fishers stuff is also so who knows.
Well the point of the matter is DMac just has more talent than Murray. They are both injury prone, so I would rather take the guy with the most upside, and thats DMac.
That said, the Raiders would want alot for him, so I don't see it happening.
I'd rather have Hunter from the rb rich 49rs or Tate from the Texans
McFadden has more talent than Murray but he misses more games plus he hasn't been all that impressive when he's been on the field the last 2 seasons. Last season he only averaged 3.3 a carry and this season he's only averaging 3.9 a carry. That's way down from his 5.4 per carry in 2011 and 5.2 per carry in 2010. Murray has rushed for more yards than McFadden the past 2 seasons and has never averaged less than 4.1 per carry. Murray is averaging 4.7 per carry this season. I would stay with Murray over McFadden who may be done by age 29.