I wouldn't call about 20 passes in 2.5 quarters taking the ball away from Romo. Sheesh. From his interception up until we got close to taking the lead, the play calling was more than 60% pass plays. Romo audibled through a 27-3 run. Whatever he was doing in that span worked like a charm.
Before the interception drive, we had 7 throws to 3 carries (70%/30%).
We then threw the ball 16 more times in a game where they were down by 21 points.
Meanwhile, we ran the ball 23 times .
That is a 40% *pass* ratio in a game the team was down by 21 points in the 2nd quarter (on the road as well).
We have a 3rd and 1 in the 3rd quarter with at least 2 TE's (may have been 3 TE's in a goal line formation, I'd have to see the play again)...the Rams have bunched up on the line and Romo decides to audible about fifteen times and snap the ball with 1 second left...so the Rams can get a better jump on the ball and they stuff Murray and we end up having to kick a FG.
Romo also wasted a timeout early in the 3rd quarter when they were still down by 4 points...because Romo couldn't stop audibling.
The INT was a terrible throw by Romo and that put us down by 21 points. And we didn't start seeing the passing game get going until the running game got going.
Less is more with Romo. The more we ask him to throw and the more imbalance we have on offense, the worse Romo gets. The more he audibles is when he gets himself in trouble.
Thankfully, we played the Rams today. But odds are if we call plays and audible out of plays like we did in our first 2 possessions and get down 21-0 and still don't understand basic situational football, teams are not going to blow those leads.
YR