Creeper
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 19,872
- Reaction score
- 25,709
I see why the ref called PI on Jones, He put his hand on the receiver's shoulder as if to use it as leverage when he leaped for the ball. The problem again, is not whether it is PI or not, it is the inconsistency in the refs calling it PI or not. If a WR did exactly the same thing to the DB, it would not be called offensive PI. Probably 90% of the time that PI call would not be made anyway. We have all seen much more contact not called. I thought it was a good play by Jones.
But to remove the inconsistency, they would have to change the rule so that any contact by either player is PI. That might get ridiculous, but otherwise it is a judgement on the part of the ref is if the contact was significant enough or not. That leads to inconsistency in the calls. The same ref may not call that same play a penalty next week.
But to remove the inconsistency, they would have to change the rule so that any contact by either player is PI. That might get ridiculous, but otherwise it is a judgement on the part of the ref is if the contact was significant enough or not. That leads to inconsistency in the calls. The same ref may not call that same play a penalty next week.

