peplaw06
That Guy
- Messages
- 13,699
- Reaction score
- 413
Gamebreaker said:More spinning.![]()
I quoted him and replied to one sentence in his whole post. Newman wasn't mentioned for the rest of it. Peplaw brought up Pacman Jones, my post was more about the whole subject of using better statistics than anything about Newman.
I did not request statistics on Newman, what are you talking about?I never made any comparisons between Rogers and Newman, more crap you've made up. I only scoofed at the silly notion that Newman is somehow head and shoulders better than both our starting corners. Where is the comparison? Furthermore, since you think you've somehow actually made a point, if you're going to compare two players WHY are you only providing the required stats from ONE PLAYER.
That proves nothing.
I also said only people who've actually watched the majority of the games a corner plays in could really be able to make true comparisons. Are you going to tell me I requested everyone to go and watch game film??This is stupid. You jumping down my throat over nothing is stupid. Spin away, Spin Doctor.
I agree that there are "better stats" to use to guage a CBs performance than tackles, INT and PD.... I just don't have those stats, forgive me.
That said, tackles, INT and PD are useful stats.
1) Tackles -- obviously a tackle may mean that the CB allowed a pass to be completed, which isn't necessarily a good thing. However, I'd rather the CB tackle the guy when he does give up a reception than let him run downfield. Face it, CBs are going to give up catches sometimes. If they're going to give up the catch, making the tackle is then a good thing. It also guages their ability to support against the run. Irrelevant to the topic of pass coverage, but relevant to the quality of the CB.
2) INT -- interceptions are an indicator of good anticipation. If a guy is good enough as a cover CB though, he's not going to see as many opportunities as your average CB. The QBs will avoid him. But INTs are meaningful, because last I checked turnovers were a good thing. Do they mean everything? No. But they do mean something.
3) Passes Defended -- also a good indicator of anticipation, but shows a reluctance to go for the big play... to be more certain to prevent the offense from making the big play. I think this is where Newman excels (when the ball is being thrown at him). He doesn't have big INT numbers, but his PD are good and opponent's completion percentage against him is low.
So in conclusion, these stats I posted aren't the "end all be all" when comparing CBs. But they can be a good (and quick) indication of which CBs are playing pretty well. My whole point in posting those stats was to show that Rogers wasn't CLEARLY better than every other rookie CB last year. And I guess I've made my point, because I haven't seen any rebuttal to that statement.