MossBurner
New Member
- Messages
- 505
- Reaction score
- 0
Vintage said:Again, for whoever said we wished Newman had a rookie year like Carlos Rogers had...
From AdamJT13...
Comments Commander fans?
Terrence Newman is good. Stats for DBs suck.
Vintage said:Again, for whoever said we wished Newman had a rookie year like Carlos Rogers had...
From AdamJT13...
Comments Commander fans?
MossBurner said:Terrence Newman is good. Stats for DBs suck.
MossBurner said:Henry and Glenn got older.
Vintage said:I think completion percentage allowed is more important than INTs. What does it matter if you get 8 INTs if you allow 70% completion rate?
I think yards given up matter more than tackles. Who cares if you can rack up tackles by allowing 15 yard completions and continue to make tackles? That's not good CB play.
Seems to me, being a good CB, you would allow a low percentage of passes completed for low yardage totals and low TD totals.
Gamebreaker said:That is exactly what I was saying. Statistics like that aren't readily available like the usual statistics you'll find at espn or nfl.com, and they're more accurate in analyzing how good a cornerback really is.
Vintage said:I thought you were saying that using stats like those suck.
My bad.
And I agree with you, FWIW.
Gamebreaker said:Nah, if you read a page back, I was giving reasons why tackles and interceptions can be percieved one way and really be another. Like a corner having more tackles than another could be percieved as being better in run support. Yet if someone actually watched all the games, he could've just been beat a whole lot more and made the tackle after the completion.
A completion percentage rate would be a more valuable statistic than tackles, interceptions, or passes defensed. Those other three stats don't tell the whole story, there is no way of getting around a completion percentage. It's about as objective as it gets.
AmericasTeam31 said:It's been given in Newman's case and you still ignore it and chose not to comment on it...
Gamebreaker said:I never even mentioned Newman in this thread. I was talking Carlos Rogers, Pacman Jones, and the stats people were comparing THEM with. What does that have to do with Newman? I never said Rogers had a better rookie season than him. Get your facts straight.
AmericasTeam31 said:I don't really care about Rogers' stats vs. anyone else from another team. That has no bearing on this discussion about the pass defenses of Wash. vs Dallas... Get those facts straight...:starspin
Gamebreaker said:So neither of our starting corners, including Springs, has ever come close to Terrence Newman?Spare me.
Most of the stats I've seen in this thread don't really show how well a corner plays his position. Tackles is a subjective stat for cornerbacks, the corner could've either been a real force in run support or burnt a whole lot by his man and made alot of tackles after the catch. Interceptions are NEVER a good indicator of who's good or not, especially if a cornerback isn't being tested often. For years I've wished the NFL or other media outlets would choose a new way of collecting stats on defensive backs.
Rogers didn't start from the beginning the same way any rookie doesn't start for Gregg Williams' defense. When he did play, he rarely gave up big plays and was solid in run support. I've seen rookie corners play alot worse. I have never seen or heard of any media outlet in DC calling Rogers "Toast". If they did, I have no idea what games they were watching, or if they were getting Rogers confused with Walt Harris.
I'm not going to back up the assertion that Rogers was the best rookie corner last season. I didn't watch very much of the other rookie corners. I do recall hearing rumors of the Titans coaching staff not being impressed with Pacman Jones, but the best way to know how good a corner is to actually watch the majority of their games. Since there is never a stat that shows how much a corner got beat. Unless someone actually watched the majority of the games both corners performed in, I don't see how anyone can make any assertions for one or the other.
AmericasTeam31 said:If I was referring to you specifically, I guess I could point out the fact that you did refer to Newman, and did state that "normal" stats don't measure the effectiveness of a DB. While I agree with that it is a good spin to say you were talking only about Rogers vs Jones... So since you were interested in the more advanced stats, I'd love to hear your comments on them. Or you can add another spin if you'd like...
superpunk said:Hell, extrapolated out, Rogers didn't even come close to Newman's "terrible" second season, while Newman was playing on one of the most terrible defenses I've ever seen.
Maybe if you're lucky, next year ONE of your two supposedly rock-solid corners will approach Newman's level of productive consistency.
But I doubt it - since neither of them have ever even come close.
AmericasTeam31 said:This is the quote you used in your post... Where does that pertain to anything other than Newman and his standing as the best corner on the two teams....? It says nothing of Jones... Nothing about anything but Newman vs. Rogers... You can try to play it off anyway you want to, bottom line is as soon as the stats are in front of you (and the other Skins fans) the rest of them disappear, and you change topics... Go ahead and spin away, ignore the FACTS you yourself requested... It's pointless to come in here if you aren't willing to face the music...