Schotty's offense will be different that MM. It will be more run based with more play action

calicowboy54

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,938
Reaction score
1,454

You know this might work. IF Shotty can talk Callahan to come back here (They Coached several places together) and be his Running Game Coordinator (OC) / Ofensive Line coach that might be a home run hire. have Scott Be the (OC) Passing Game Coordinator/ QB Coach & they come up with game plan and i dont care who calls the plays.
 

deerhunter11

Well-Known Member
Messages
637
Reaction score
598
Play action does not work when you can't run the ball.

If we draft a top running back, our run game will be improved by osmosis, if you want to give the credit to BS, go ahead.

Run it back with our same RB's from last year and I would love to see how play action is going to work.
Dallas will have to draft some speed at RB and WR or you can call 2025 a lost year .
 

RustyBourneHorse

Well-Known Member
Messages
42,069
Reaction score
48,690
Play action does not work when you can't run the ball.

If we draft a top running back, our run game will be improved by osmosis, if you want to give the credit to BS, go ahead.

Run it back with our same RB's from last year and I would love to see how play action is going to work.

All the more reason I want either Jeanty or an olineman round one and Skatabo (if we go oline first)
 

vlad

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,598
Reaction score
2,539
I don't see Dak moving well enough for play action - I would love a play action offense but i'd love a lot of things the Cowboys.

I could easily see Dak running play action like first play and getting hammered by an unblocked monster.
 

BermyStar

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,590
Reaction score
2,220
Play action does not work when you can't run the ball.

If we draft a top running back, our run game will be improved by osmosis, if you want to give the credit to BS, go ahead.

Run it back with our same RB's from last year and I would love to see how play action is going to work.
"Play action does not work when you can't run the ball." - This has catagorically been proven wrong
 

CATCH17

1st Round Pick
Messages
67,854
Reaction score
86,643
that would be ok. I just saw a mock draft- I think from CBS Sports- that had us taking a TE with our 1st rounder. I don't pretend to know college football- but I know I dont want a TE in round 1.
I’ll gladly take Warren with our first pick. He’s worth it and a potential cornerstone.

We need better blocking and playmakers. He instantly gives us both.
 

sjmike

Well-Known Member
Messages
809
Reaction score
1,507
that would be ok. I just saw a mock draft- I think from CBS Sports- that had us taking a TE with our 1st rounder. I don't pretend to know college football- but I know I dont want a TE in round 1.
That tight end is a game changer and well worth it although it's not a huge need like RB
 

Gonzomandela01

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,716
Reaction score
2,246
Will this draft be offensive heavy then?

I see them taking RB and WR in the first and second.

Schotty is gonna try to get some talent on his side, lets see who is gonna be the DC, he needs to step on the table and demand some DTs and Lbs, maybe a DE Law looks done, because we all know no significant free agents will be signed.
 

Jimbo123

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,929
Reaction score
1,471
I've seen a couple with Jeanty going to us at 12. When an elite RB can be bought for 8-12 million a year, i just don't see taking one in the first round unless the REST of the roster is great.....this roster needs DT, LB and CBs and that's just on defense
:hammer::hammer::hammer::hammer::hammer:
 

pansophy

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,182
Reaction score
4,264
This is dumb. Kellen Moore is a bad pass happy coordinator and won’t run the ball. Oh wait, he gets Barkley and a real OL and now has a 2000 yard rusher.

We can talk about running the ball and play action all we want but as long as the OL can’t create push in the running game it’s just words.
 
Top